Case study:Restoration of Juottimenoja Brook

From RESTORE
Revision as of 11:30, 21 August 2012 by Laamaneno (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 60° 11' 22.62" N, 23° 5' 57.75" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management
Country Finland
Main contact forename Jukka
Main contact surname Jormola
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Juottimenoja brook is a small tributary of the Kiskonjoki-Perniönjoki River located in south-west Finland. The surrounding of Juottimenoja is intensively cultivated and the latest dredging was in 1970. The brook suffered severe erosion and siltation problems due to erosion-prone soil, intensive farming, and previous straightening. Juottimenoja brook was restored because fields were inundating during high flows. The objective of the restoration was to decrease water levels, and thus field flooding, and control the in-channel erosion during high flows and siltation during low flows. The aim of the restoration was to maintain the brook morphological and ecological diversity and self-purification capacity while meeting the drainage needs of the farmland. In the latest drainage project in 2007 flood terrace were excavated and nature-like submerged weirs were constructed to stop erosion. Besides drainage the environmentally sound measures could help to maintain the original sea trout population in the brook.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Kiskonjoki-Perniönjoki River Basin
River basin

Subcatchment

River name Juottimenoja Brook
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Organic (i.e. Peat)
Ecoregion Fenno-Scandian Shield
Dominant land cover Intensive agriculture (arable)
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Juottimenoja Brook Catchment
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology eroded channel
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Ephemeral, Quick run-off
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable)
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2007/01/01
Works started
Works completed 2007/01/01
Project completed
Total cost category 50 - 100 k€
Total cost (k€) 63 k€63,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Continuity of sediment transport, Width & depth variation, Structure & condition of intertidal zone
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information