Case study:Revitalisation of branch ’Felsőszentmártoni’ at River Dráva

From RESTORE
Revision as of 13:00, 9 August 2012 by Rogier (talk | contribs) (XML import)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 45° 50' 10.49" N, 17° 42' 30.06" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country Hungary
Main contact forename
Main contact surname
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation South-Transdanubian Water Management Directorate - titkarsag@ddvizig.hu
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin Danube

Subcatchment

River name Drava
Area category 1000 - 10000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Alps
Dominant land cover Extensive agriculture, Grassland
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Kleblach-Side channel, Revitalisation of branches ’Boros Dráva and Drávakeresztúri’, Water and Life for Drava and Vuka


Site

Edit site
Name Felsőszentmárton
WFD water body codes AEP438
WFD (national) typology 14
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Artifical oxbow completely cut-off from the main river, Silted up significantly
Reference morphology Sidearm
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation EU - Special Area of Conservation
Local/regional site designations National Park, UNESCO Biosphere Reserve, Natura 2000
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Permanent lentic
Dominant substrate Gravel, Silt
River corridor land use Woodland, Intensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category more than 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 502502 m³/s <br />502,000 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 1500 m1.5 km <br />150,000 cm <br />
Project started 2010/11/01
Works started 2011/03/01
Works completed 2012/10/01
Project completed
Total cost category 500 - 1000 k€
Total cost (k€) 596 k€596,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources European Union and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision South Transdanubian Regional Development Council and Agency ddrft@ddrft.hu
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Continuity of sediment transport, Substrate conditions
Biology Fish: Species composition, Phytoplankton: Blooms
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement, Community demand


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Dredging: removal of 47, 735 m3 alluvium, Reconstruction of the current weir - height reduction, Pipeline laid in the lower parts of the weir
Floodplain / River corridor Removal of the overgrown salicaceae trees
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Ensuring biodiversity
Social measures (incl. engagement) Recreation
Other Consultation, Information provision


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Quantity & dynamics of flow Yes Yes Improvement
Continuity for organisms Yes Yes Improvement
Substrate conditions Yes Yes Improvement

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Species composition Yes Yes Yes Yes Awaiting results
Fish: Age structure Yes Yes Yes Awaiting results

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information