Case study:Welton Farm Landfill/Riverbank Works

From RESTORE
Revision as of 10:15, 21 March 2019 by Crchalmers (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 56° 35' 8.51" N, 3° 18' 24.57" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Country Scotland
Main contact forename Chris
Main contact surname Chalmers
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation PKC
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The River Ericht is part of the wider Tay catchment and has a steep, flashy catchment with an area of 432km2 to its confluence with the River Isla which later joins the River Tay. The project was located 2km downstream of Blairgowrie, Scotland and located within a Special Area of Conservation (SAC), UK0030312. The project was undertaken on a historic landfill site on the south riverbank of the River Ericht. There is considerable ecological variety in the Tay catchment, resulting in the Tay supporting the full range of salmon life-history types found in Scotland, with adult salmon entering the River Tay throughout the year to spawn in different parts of the catchment. In addition, Otter, Beaver, Bird and three Lamprey species (Sea, Brook and River) were found within the SAC.

The project consisted of landfill and riverbank remediation work. Landfill material was polluting the River Ericht impacting the watercourse and subsequent SAC following numerous spate events in 2015/16. This had a direct impact upon the ecology and environment. The aim of the project was to prevent further landfill material entering the watercourse and to install protective measures to protect the riverbank and reduce further erosion. 

The project consisted of excavating 1800m3 of earth equating to approximately 3000 tonnes. The earth was put into a trommel where the landfill material was separated from the earth. The clean earth was used to re-profile the embankment and the landfill material sent to a recycling centre. The waste generated was approx. 50 tonnes; upwards of 97% was recycled. The waste consisted of timber, plastic, metal and green waste. Timber was shredded and used fuel (100% diverted from landfill), green waste was put into anaerobic digestion and turned into electricity and/or mixed with food waste to make compost (100% diverted from landfill) and general waste was handpicked and recycled (approx. 97% - 100% diverted from landfill). This is well within the targets set out within Scotland’s Zero Waste Plan which aims at 70% waste to be recycled and maximum 5% to landfill by 2025.

A number of non-structural green measures were implemented to stabilise the riverbank and reduce erosion. These include root wads, coir matting, planting live willow and sowing grass seed. A number of trees were removed as part of the site clearance process. These were set aside and later installed as and installed into the embankment and anchored with rock armour. Root wads were installed from upstream to downstream and spaced along riverbank at 5m intervals.

Root wads were installed on the outer bend of the River Ericht; this will help to absorb and distribute the energy from the river, reducing the erosive potential. Scour pools are predicted to form at the base of the root wad which can lead to reduced flow velocities enabling bankside habitats to form. Variation of the watercourse will increase by changing the temperature and oxygen levels across its cross sectional area. The creation of riffles, pools and shaded areas benefit the macro-invertebrate population and help to improve water quality, vital for maintaining the interaction of species protected within the SAC.

The new embankment was installed with biodegradable coir matting; this increases surface cover and generates roughness, key properties in controlling soil erosion. The coir matting was anchored to the embankment using FSC (sustainably sourced) timber stakes. A hedgerow grass seed mix was sown into the coir matting; this provides a diverse plant assemblage (native grass & wildflower) promoting plant diversity. This attracts insects and invertebrates including bees and butterflies; a step to provide habitats for species which are in national decline due to habitat loss. This supports the action plan set out in the Tayside Local Biodiversity Action Plan (2016-2026).

Live Osier willow was planted at 1m2 intervals, this introduces a root network which will help to stabilise the embankment. Willow provides habitat for flora and fauna, creating shading of riverbanks and spawning areas. Willow also promotes bank stabilisation, protects the aquatic environment from polluted surface runoff and improves soil chemistry by increasing humus formation. Fourteen trees were removed as part of the site clearance. As part of my sustainable environmental approach, I replanted twenty trees to replace the habitats lost and achieve net biodiversity gain. Hawthorn and Crab Apple were planted; this benefits pollinators such as honey, bumble and solitary bee species, together with moths and butterflies. Fruits are eaten by birds and mammal and are an important resource for migrant birds. A recent review of UK biodiversity (Natural Ecosystem Assessment) states that 40% of our most important habitats and 30% of rarest species are still in decline.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


The project has only recently been completed and the full benefits have yet to be quantified. The willow and grass seed has started to grow following a mild autumn in 2018 and the integrity of the riverbank has been tested following a number of spate events in December 2018 and February/March 2019. A monitoring regime has been set up in order to assess the longer term performance of the scheme.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Firmly secure willow tubing; approx. 5% lost during spate event. Willow whips to be planted from Autumn - early spring. Willow pots installed thereafter. Waste to be protected by netting to prevent windblown pollution.


Image gallery


Historic Landfill
Root Wad Installation
Project Completion
Drone Image Following Works
Repfrofiling
Separation of waste
Separation of waste
root wad placement
root wad placement
Drone during works
Drone during works
Coir matting with trench
willow installation
Root wad
Completion
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Tay
River basin River Ericht

Subcatchment

River name River Ericht
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2) 432432 km² <br />43,200 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Paleozoic - Devonian
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Intensive agriculture (arable)
Waterbody ID



Site

Name River Ericht
WFD water body codes 6535
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name River Ericht
Pre-project morphology Sinuous
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology Reinforced banks
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation EU - Special Area of Conservation
Local/regional site designations Special Area of Conservation
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Otter (Lutra lutra), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), Sea lamprey, Brook lamprey, river lamprey, Beaver, badger, sand martin (Riparia riparia), yellow hammer
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Glacial Till, Boulders, Glaciofluvial, Alluvium, Gravel
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable)
Average bankfull channel width category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category 100 - 1000 m³/s
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 187m³"m³" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Average channel gradient category Less than 0.001
Average channel gradient 0.0083
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 50m0.05 km <br />5,000 cm <br />
Project started 01/04/2017
Works started 2018/07/02
Works completed 2018/08/08
Project completed 2019/08/09
Total cost category 50 - 100 k€
Total cost (k€) 8000080,000 k€ <br />80,000,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Local Authorities, Scottish Government

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Perth and Kinross Council
Stakeholder engagement and communication Perth and Kinross Council
Works and works supervision Perth and Kinross Council
Post-project management and maintenance Perth and Kinross Council
Monitoring Perth and Kinross Council



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information