Case study:Beneden-Berkel

From RESTORE
Revision as of 16:23, 18 September 2013 by InfoMan (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 9' 15.66" N, 6° 17' 50.82" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site http://www.wrij.nl/thema'/actueel/projecten/berkel-almen/
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
Country Netherlands
Main contact forename Ellen
Main contact surname Bollen-Weide
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site http://www.wrij.nl/
Partner organisations Provincie Gelderland
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
File:BannerBenedenBerkel.jpg
Banner for the Beneden-Berkel project (courtesy of Waterschap Rijn & IJssel)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Al vanaf de Middeleeuwen werkt de mens aan de Berkel. Eerst om hem bevaarbaar te maken en te houdenen vanaf de jaren dertig om overstromingen te verminderen. De Berkel is hierdoor in de loop der jaren veranderd in een rechte eentonige rivier. Nu voegen we weer een stuk verloren gegane natuur toe. Hierdoor kunnen veel meer soorten planten en dieren in en langs de Berkel leven. Bovendien wordt het water schoner.

The measures that will be taken are:

  • remeandering and introduction of woody debris to create more variety in stream flow, water depth and plant growth;
  • cascading fish passages will be made on the Besselink and Warken dams;
  • land consolidation, to move production lands away from the low lying (thus wet) river banks, and closer to the farms, thus reducing distance travelled by farmers;
  • a swimming pool and a walking path will be made, in order to better facilitate recreation.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information