Case study:Rottal Burn
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Scotland |
Main contact forename | Nick |
Main contact surname | Elbourne |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Esk Valley Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.eskvalleytrust.org/ |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The reach of the Rottal burn between Rottal Lodge and its confluence with the South Esk has historically been realigned and straightened since the 1830’s. In 2003, just prior to the Water Framework Directive coming into force, the stretch was dredged out destroying the existing habitat.
The works carried out in 2012 aimed to restore natural river processes and in stream and riparian habitat, specifically for Atlantic salmon and freshwater pearl mussel alongside other fish species. It is relevant to note that the freshwater pearl mussel is dependent on juvenile salmon populations for the completion of its life cycle.
Objectives of the project included: • Restoration of the canalised water course as far as possible to its natural course (to be extended from 650m to 1,100m) • Reconnection of the Rottal Burn with its flood plain • Creation of a diverse riparian and aquatic habitat including the incorporation of the existing wetland habitat into the final restoration design • Reduction in the unnaturally high sediment loading during high flow events which is then deposited in the lower reaches • A return to a more natural flow regime • Attenuation of flood peaks • Visual enhancement of the area • Restoration of sustainable, functional populations of multi-sea-winter salmon and trout and of freshwater pearl mussels • The possibility of transferring freshwater pearl mussels into the burn will be investigated • Development a demonstration site available for future research • Provision of restoration experience which would be transferable to other similar situations within the catchment
Construction works were designed to create the restored channel without any import or export of materials, by using existing gravel embankments to provide any material needed. Large woody debris (trees with rootballs) which were sourced from the local estate, were used to reinforce possible areas of adjustment. A two-phase construction programme was used; Firstly the new channel was constructed and vegetation growth allowed to take hold. Following this flow was diverted into the new channel. Challenges at the site included the remote location, adverse weather conditions and the presence of overhead services. A number of sediment bar features have already formed, significantly improving the habitat, which is confirmed by the presence of salmon spawning in the new channel.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | Sout Esk |
---|---|
River basin | South Esk |
Subcatchment
River name | South Esk |
---|---|
Area category | 100 - 1000 km² |
Area (km2) | 564 km²56,400 ha <br /> |
Maximum altitude category | 200 - 500 m |
Maximum altitude (m) | |
Dominant geology | Siliceous |
Ecoregion | Great Britain |
Dominant land cover | Grassland, Woodland |
Waterbody ID |
Other case studies in this subcatchment: South Esk restoration
Site
Name | Rottal Burn |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | Straightened, dredged (to remove gravels) |
Reference morphology | Actively meandering (historic channel identified) |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | No |
National/international site designation | EU - Special Area of Conservation |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | Yes |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | Atlantic salmon, The freshwater pearl mussel |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | Gravel |
River corridor land use | Rough unimproved grassland/pasture |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 11001,100 m <br />1.1 km <br />110,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 2012 |
Works started | 2012/04/01 |
Works completed | 2012/08/01 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | 100 - 500 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | SEPA Restoration fund |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Adding sinuosity, Bank re-grading, Decrease sedimentation, expansion of river bed on some parts of the river |
Floodplain / River corridor | Floodplain reconnection, removal of embankments |
Planform / Channel pattern | Creation of sinuosity |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Channel pattern/planform | No | Yes | No | No | No |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Fish | No | Yes | No | No | No |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information