Case study:Restoration of the river Akerselva

From RESTORE
Revision as of 12:15, 6 December 2019 by NIVA DK (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 59° 54' 49.76" N, 10° 45' 30.27" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Social benefits, Spatial planning, Water quality, Urban
Country Norway
Main contact forename Agency of Urban Environment
Main contact surname Oslo municipality
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Oslo municipality
Contact organisation web site http://www.oslo.kommune.no
Partner organisations Akerselvas Venner (MAV), Sub-district (Vannområde) Oslo, Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA)
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The river Akerselva is one of the main rivers that flows through Oslo city and starts at the lake Maridalsvannet north of the Oslo city. And like many other urban rivers Akerselva was impacted by urban development and activities. A lot has been done in recent years regarding the improvement of the water quality and the reduction of pollutions to the river. Restoration efforts has also been done in resent years or is planned to be done in the future. Here is a list of some of the restoration measures that has been completed until now in different parts/sections of the river:

• 2000: Reopening of the river in relation to Akerselva miljøpark in Nydalen • 2013: Habitat improvement measures in Akerselva between Kuba and Ankerbua • 2016: Habitat improvement measures by Kubaparken • 2017: Habitat improvement measures in the Karsten Warholm neighborhood by Badebekken • 2018: Habitat improvement measures at 3 localities in Akerselvas middle part (by Myreløkka, Ivan Bjøndals gate and Lillogata) • 2019: Bulilding/improving fish stairs at Grønvoldsterskelen

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Akerselva
WFD water body codes 006-74-R
WFD (national) typology REL2311
WFD water body name Akerselva nedstrøms Nydalsdammen
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Salmon and Sea-trout
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Cobble
River corridor land use Urban
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category 1 - 10 m³/s
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 6.436.43 m³/s <br />6,430 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2011/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2026/01/01
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Oslo municipality

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Urbanisation, Pollution incident
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Community demand, Landscape enhancement, Recreation


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information