Case study:Matanza-Riachuelo

From RESTORE
Revision as of 15:39, 1 July 2015 by Matanza (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 34° 39' 30.66" S, 58° 25' 0.04" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site http://www.uflo.edu.ar
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Social benefits, Spatial planning, Urban
Country Argentina
Main contact forename Ana
Main contact surname Faggi
Main contact user ID User:matanza
Contact organisation Flores University
Contact organisation web site http://www.uflo.edu.ar
Partner organisations Agencia de Protección Ambiental, Ciudad de Buenos Aires
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Phytoremediation of the banks with native plants

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This phytoremediation project aims to rehabilitate 100 m of the riverbanks in the Matanza-Riachuelo river which was characterized in 2013 by Green Cross Switzerland as one of the ten most polluted sites in the World. Nowadays, the river basin is subjected to different types of contaminants from agricultural and urban runoff, industrial effluents, sewage treatment plants and leaching from domestic garbage dumps. Through the enhancement of native vegetation with high phytoremediation capability the project aims to improve 1) the quality of life of the urban residents through the revitalization of public space; 2) the environmental recovery in all its components (water, air and soil).

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Up to date metals contents in soil, roots and leaves of the implanted herbs and trees are being monitored to evaluate the remediation capacity.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information