Case study:Restoration project in Serpis River in the tt.mm. Lorcha (Alicante province) and Villalonga (Valencia province)

From RESTORE
Revision as of 09:31, 27 December 2012 by CIREF AI (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes
Country Spain
Main contact forename CHJ
Main contact surname CHJ
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


In the Serpis River there are a variety of habitats, from riparian forest with undamaged stretches to Mediterranean forest. There are also elements of great cultural and heritage value, as mills from the XIX century. Anthropic pressure, mainly agriculture and hydropower industry makes necessary the restoration to ensure the ecological river corridor. The actions of the project are: Recovery of the river mobility space; Recovery of river morphology: recovery of the steepness of the slopes of the channel and the original path of the river (oxbow connection); Recovery of longitudinal continuity: demolition of 5 obsolete weirs and construction of fish ladders in two weirs; Clean channel and its banks; Elimination of exotics plants, silvicultural treatments and planting of riparian trees and shrubs; and installation of information panels and limitation on use of roads. The project has a total budget of 6.912.492€ and is financed by the Ministry of Environment, as part of the National Strategy for River Restoration.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district C.H.Júcar
River basin Serpis

Subcatchment

River name Serpis
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 400 m0.4 km <br />40,000 cm <br />
Dominant geology
Ecoregion Ibero-Macaronesian
Dominant land cover Extensive agriculture
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Río Serpis entre el embalse de Beniarrés y el azud de la Reprimala
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Sinuous
Reference morphology Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations Site of Community Importance
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Extensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 2.52.5 m³/s <br />2,500 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 16100 m16.1 km <br />1,610,000 cm <br />
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 5000 - 10000 k€
Total cost (k€) 6912 k€6,912,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources MARM

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision C.H.Júcar
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms, Continuity of sediment transport, Channel pattern/planform, Structure & condition of riparian zones
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Recreation


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Revetmens with local species, Removal of 5 small weirs, Removal of exotic plants, Installing fish scales in 2 weirs
Floodplain / River corridor Removal of exotic plants
Planform / Channel pattern Re-instatement of old course (meander)
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Information panels for people, New pahts near the river, New river information panel
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information