Case study:The Babina Restoration Project

From RESTORE
Revision as of 06:06, 4 September 2012 by Marinela (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 45° 25' 29.15" N, 29° 24' 42.35" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country Romania
Main contact forename Marian
Main contact surname Tudor
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea
Contact organisation web site http://www.ddni.ro
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
The Babina - present situation

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin Danube Delta

Subcatchment

River name Chilia Branch
Area category Less than 10 km²
Area (km2) 2.102.1 km² <br />210 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 2.42.4 m <br />0.0024 km <br />240 cm <br />
Dominant geology Organic (i.e. Peat)
Ecoregion Pontic Province
Dominant land cover Grassland, Reed
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: The Cernovca Restoration Project


Site

Edit site
Name Agricultural polder Babina
WFD water body codes RORW14.1_B6
WFD (national) typology RO15
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Embanked
Reference morphology Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations RAMSAR site
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate Sand, Clay
River corridor land use Grassland
Average bankfull channel width category more than 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m) 340340 m <br />0.34 km <br />34,000 cm <br />
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient 0.015
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 1991/01/01
Works started 1994/04/01
Works completed 1994/05/01
Project completed
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro) Marian Tudor
Monitoring The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro) Marian Tudor



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish: Species composition
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement, Recreation


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of wetlands
Planform / Channel pattern Reconnecting Babina polder to

the Danube flooded regime

Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Quantity & dynamics of flow Improvement
Continuity of sediment transport Improvement

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Species composition Improvement
Phytoplankton: Taxonomic composition Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Nutrient concentrations Improvement

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Ecological tourism development Improvement


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents


Development of zoobenthos in the restored polder Babina



Image gallery


The Babina polder before restoration
The Babina polder after restoration
Restored lake and Babina Island
European mink (Mustela lutreola) in the restored area
European otter (Lutra lutra) in the restored area
Little egret (Egretta garzetta) in the restored area
Satellite image of Babina area (1993)
Satellite image of Babina area (1996)


Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information