Case study:Restoration of Longinoja brook

From RESTORE
Revision as of 07:24, 10 September 2012 by Laamaneno (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 60° 14' 54.16" N, 25° 1' 36.90" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes
Country Finland
Main contact forename Virho
Main contact surname Webb
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Finnish Environment Institute
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Longinoja after restauration_may 2006 (photo: Liisa Laitinen)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Longinoja brook has been restored several times during last years. The straightened brook flows through both a densely populated area and along farmland and is an important breeding area for sea trout in the Vantaanjoki River in Helsinki city. The aims of restorations have been to increase the breeding possibilities for migrating fish and also to improve the area’s landscape. Restoration was part of the project where modern environmental hydraulic engineering methods were studied in the areas with fine-grained soils. The planning aimed to enhance natural conditions and at the same time maintain sufficient drainage level. The restoration project was good example of succeeded co-operation between different organizations and stakeholders. The project was managed by the Finnish Environmental authorities (Finnish Environment Institute and Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment) and the city of Helsinki and mostly accomplished by volunteers in co-operation with the authorities.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Southern Finland
River basin Vantaanjoki River

Subcatchment

River name Longinoja brook
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2) 12 km²1,200 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion Fenno-Scandian Shield
Dominant land cover Urban
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Cathment of Longinoja brook
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Straight
Reference morphology Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations multiple designations across the site
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Ephemeral
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Urban
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2006/01/01
Works started
Works completed 2011/01/01
Project completed
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€) 10000 k€10,000,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Finnish Environment Institute

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring Finnish Environment Institute



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms, Continuity of sediment transport
Biology Fish: Species composition, Fish: Abundance, Fish: Disturbance-sensitive species, Invertebrates: Abundance
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Building fishways, Building of submerged weirs and pits, Adding sinuosity, Introducing gravel
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Introducing sinuosity, Introducting large woody debris
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other Information provision, Participation in works, Participation in monitoring


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Continuity for organisms Awaiting results
Continuity of sediment transport Awaiting results

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Abundance Awaiting results
Fish: Disturbance-sensitive species Awaiting results
Fish: Age structure Awaiting results
Invertebrates: Abundance Awaiting results

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
[[]]

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Landscape enchansement Yes Awaiting results


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery


Longinoja after restauration may 2006 (photo: Liisa Laitinen).jpg
Longinoja restauration march 2006 (photo:Jukka Jormola).jpg
Longinoja brook after restoration (photo: Lasse Jarvenpaa; www.itamerihaaste.net
Stream restoration by voluntary work_Longinoja Brook_May 2012 (photo: Auri Sarvilinna; www.environment.fi/default.asp)
After restauration (photo:Liisa Laitinen, SYKE; www.itamerihaaste.net)
Before restauration (photo:Harri Aulaskari; www.itamerihaaste.net)
Spowning trout on a restored Longinoja gravel bad (photo:www.ecrr.org.)


Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information