Case study:Tolka Valley Park erosion control

From RESTORE
Revision as of 17:59, 6 September 2013 by SFW Rob (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://riverwiki.restorerivers.eu/wiki/index.php?title=Case_study%3ATolka_Valley_Park_erosion_control
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Social benefits
Country Ireland
Main contact forename Maryann
Main contact surname Harrie
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Dublin City Council
Contact organisation web site http://www.dublincity.ie
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The improvement of the Tolka Valley Park by Dublin City Council along the River Tolka created opportunity to pilot a new piloted approach under Renew4GPP, which is an EU LIFE Project (LIFE09 ENV/BE/000406).

The project aimed to enhance green space in an urban area by demonstrating to local authorities the ecological advantages to prevent erosion using high-quality and 100% biodegradable matting materials. This project also targeted existing fisheries to be improved with an increase of people engagement and the support from the Inland Fisheries Ireland and the Tolka Trout Anglers Association.

This piloted matting approach uses biodegradable weed control matting to be installed in areas of exposed soil. The site is being monitored by the Parks and Landscape Services Division to assess the effectiveness of the matting approach. First results indicate that it is preventing soil loss during flooding, resisting burning and reducing maintenance requirements.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Tolka Valley Park at Finglas.jpg
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation EU - Special Area of Conservation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Otter (Lutra lutra), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), kingfisher (Alcedo atthis), Bats (4 spp.), Trout
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications New bioengineering elements in order to improve banks
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.dublincity.ie/RecreationandCulture/DublinCityParks/VisitaPark/Documents/Tolka%20valley%20Greenway.pdf Tolka Valley Greenway factsheet
http://Dublin City Council Local Parks: Tolka Valley Park http://www.dublincity.ie/RecreationandCulture/DublinCityParks/VisitaPark/Pages/TolkaValleyPark.aspx

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information