Case study:Kuuskoski-Fishway: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
|Main contact forename=Pasi
|Main contact forename=Pasi
|Main contact surname=Lempinen
|Main contact surname=Lempinen
|Main contact id=Arolam
|Contact organisation=Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment
|Contact organisation=Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Restoration of Koskenkylänjoki River
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Restoration of Koskenkylänjoki River
Line 22: Line 23:
|Project picture=Kuuskoski Torrent fishway(photo.Pasi Lempinen).jpg
|Project picture=Kuuskoski Torrent fishway(photo.Pasi Lempinen).jpg
|Picture description=Kuuskoski fishway (photo:Pasi Lempinen)
|Picture description=Kuuskoski fishway (photo:Pasi Lempinen)
|Project summary=Construction of Kuuskoski fishway was part of the Koskenkylänjoki River restoration project. In 20th century Koskenkylänjoki River was known for its sea trout population. Dams made it impossible for the migrants to rise up in the stream and population density of sea trout decreased radically. In 2008 the regional ELY-centre (environmental authority) launched a project during which a bypass for the migrants was built. The aim of the restoration was to promote the natural breeding of migratory whitefish, salmon and sea trout. The project was managed by Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Uusimaa (environmental authority) and financed by The European Fisheries Fund (EFF) and the state of Finland.
|Project summary=Construction of Kuuskoski fishway was part of the Koskenkylänjoki River restoration project. In 20th century Koskenkylänjoki River was known for its sea trout population. Dams made it impossible for the migrants to rise up in the stream and population density of sea trout decreased radically. In 2008 the regional ELY-centre (environmental authority) launched a project during which a bypass for the migrants was built. The aim of the restoration was to promote the natural breeding of migratory whitefish, salmon and sea trout. The project was managed by Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Uusimaa (regional environmental authority) and financed by The European Fisheries Fund (EFF) and the state of Finland.
}}
}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case_study_subcatchment

Revision as of 10:07, 12 February 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 60° 29' 58.74" N, 25° 56' 32.30" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?contentid=202755
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower
Country Finland
Main contact forename Pasi
Main contact surname Lempinen
Main contact user ID User:Arolam
Contact organisation Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Restoration of Koskenkylänjoki River

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Kuuskoski fishway (photo:Pasi Lempinen)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Construction of Kuuskoski fishway was part of the Koskenkylänjoki River restoration project. In 20th century Koskenkylänjoki River was known for its sea trout population. Dams made it impossible for the migrants to rise up in the stream and population density of sea trout decreased radically. In 2008 the regional ELY-centre (environmental authority) launched a project during which a bypass for the migrants was built. The aim of the restoration was to promote the natural breeding of migratory whitefish, salmon and sea trout. The project was managed by Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Uusimaa (regional environmental authority) and financed by The European Fisheries Fund (EFF) and the state of Finland.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district
River basin Koskenkylänjoki River BAsin

Subcatchment

River name Kuuskoski Torrent
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Organic (i.e. Peat)
Ecoregion Fenno-Scandian Shield
Dominant land cover Intensive agriculture (arable)
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Kuuskoski Torrent
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2008/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 202 k€202,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources EU, State

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Building fishway, Introducing gravel, Building of submerged weirs and pits, Introducing stones
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Awaiting results
Fish Awaiting results

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery


Kuuskoski Torrent fishway (photo:Pasi Lempinen)


Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information