Case study:Allt Lorgy River Restoration: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Allt Lorgy River Restoration
|Status=In progress
|Status=In progress
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring
Line 14: Line 13:
|Contact organisation=Spey Catchment Initiative
|Contact organisation=Spey Catchment Initiative
|Contact organisation url=speyfisheryboard.com
|Contact organisation url=speyfisheryboard.com
|Partner organisations=Spey Fishery Board, Cairngorm National Park Authority, Scottish Natural Heritage, SEPA
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=Lorgy burn intro photo.jpg
|Picture description=Straightened section of the Allt Lorgy Burn
|Project summary=This project aims to restore the morphology and habitat of a 600m section of moderately high energy river and its floodplain by removing significant artificial constraints (man made embankments and boulders.  Over the years these have canalised the water course from a multi braided to a single channel. By kick starting the process the intention is that over time the watercourse will do its own work to re-establish a natural equilibrium. In September 2012, five artificial embankments were lowered by the removal of over 900m3 of material.  In stream boulders were removed and replaced with large wood structures.  Additional wood structures were introduced in key locations and some of the extracted gravel was graded and stockpiled ready to be used for sediment reintoduction.  Culvert pipes were removed from the floodplain and one large drainage ditch was in filled.
}}
}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}

Revision as of 16:24, 15 January 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 57° 16' 18.18" N, 3° 50' 33.26" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring
Country Scotland
Main contact forename Liz
Main contact surname Henderson
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Spey Catchment Initiative
Contact organisation web site http://speyfisheryboard.com
Partner organisations Spey Fishery Board, Cairngorm National Park Authority, Scottish Natural Heritage, SEPA
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Straightened section of the Allt Lorgy Burn

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This project aims to restore the morphology and habitat of a 600m section of moderately high energy river and its floodplain by removing significant artificial constraints (man made embankments and boulders. Over the years these have canalised the water course from a multi braided to a single channel. By kick starting the process the intention is that over time the watercourse will do its own work to re-establish a natural equilibrium. In September 2012, five artificial embankments were lowered by the removal of over 900m3 of material. In stream boulders were removed and replaced with large wood structures. Additional wood structures were introduced in key locations and some of the extracted gravel was graded and stockpiled ready to be used for sediment reintoduction. Culvert pipes were removed from the floodplain and one large drainage ditch was in filled.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment



Site

Edit site
Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Removal of artificial constraints (embankments and boulders) to restore morphology and habitat of a multi braided watercourse that had been canalised into a single channel.
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Demonstrate and monitor natural flood management techniques in the catchment


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information