Case study:Skårhultsdammen bypass channel at River Knipån: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Sinuous (photo. Maria Arola).JPG | |||
|Caption=Meandering of the new stream (photo. Maria Arola) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Creation of variation of the stream by adding stones and gravel (photo. Maria Arola).JPG | |||
|Caption=Constructed new stream (stones and gravel added) (photo. Maria Arola) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Confluence of old stream and new strem (photo. Maria Arola).JPG | |||
|Caption=Confluence of old stream and new strem (photo. Maria Arola) | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | {{Image gallery end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} |
Revision as of 14:17, 13 December 2012
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/vattern/Sv/besoksmal-vatterbackar/knipan/Pages/Skarhultsdammen.aspx |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower |
Country | Sweden |
Main contact forename | - |
Main contact surname | - |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Länsstyrelsen i Jönköpings län |
Contact organisation web site | http://projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/vattern/Sv/besoksmal-vatterbackar/knipan/Pages/Skarhultsdammen.aspx |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Skårhultsdammen pond was built in 1920th century and was used as water regulation for Kvarnekulla power plant. Local farmers were using water from Skårhultsdammen for irrigation which made water level downstreams unnatural low. There were also other negative effects of the pond for the river. One of the biggest problems for the ecology of the Knipån was the outlet of the pond which made the migration difficult for fish like trout and greyling. Also coarse fish which thrivdes in the pond had negative effects for migrating fish.
In 2009 and 2010 started the project as the aim of improving ecological and hydromorphological conditions of the River Knipån. The longest bypass channel in Sweden was constructed for making fish migration possible and making hydromorpological condtitions of the water closer to natural state. All and all 55 000 m2 sediment was taken away which increased the water volyme from 25 000 m2 to 80 000 m2. Total cost of the restoration was about 230 000 euros.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | Habo |
---|---|
River basin | Knipån |
Subcatchment
River name | Knipån |
---|---|
Area category | |
Area (km2) | |
Maximum altitude category | |
Maximum altitude (m) | |
Dominant geology | |
Ecoregion | Fenno-Scandian Shield |
Dominant land cover | |
Waterbody ID |
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Kvarnekulla nature like bypass channel at River Knipån
Site
Name | Skårhultsdammen pond |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | |
Reference morphology | Bypass channel |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | No |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | |
---|---|
Project started | |
Works started | |
Works completed | |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | |
Total cost (k€) | |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Mitigation of a pressure | |
---|---|
Hydromorphology | |
Biology | |
Physico-chemical | |
Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information