Case study:River Gelsa at Bevtoft: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
{{Biological quality element table row | {{Biological quality element table row | ||
|Element=Invertebrates: Diversity | |Element=Invertebrates: Diversity | ||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=Yes | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Invertebrates: Abundance | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |Monitored before=Yes | ||
|Monitored after=Yes | |Monitored after=Yes |
Revision as of 09:25, 4 December 2012
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Denmark |
Main contact forename | Nick |
Main contact surname | Elbourne |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | River Restoration Centre |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
From July to September 1989 a 1.3 km reach of the river which had historically been straightened and channelised, was restored to a 1.9 km meandering course.
Rip-rap structures were created in the new meanders using 1000 m3 of stone. 740m3 of gravels were used to create new spawning grounds.
In total sixteen new meanders were created, transforming the in stream morphology, decreasing channel width by 3-4m and reducing discharge capacity by around 50%. Sinuosity also increased from 1.15 and 1.60. A weir structure was also demolished just upstream of the project area as part of the restoration design.
A similar upstream reach was left in the original channelised state to act as a benchmark against which improvements in the restored channel could be measured. An extensive maintenance regime of dredging and mechanical weed clearance was altered to weed clearance by scythe, and later to no human intervention. This reach represents an alternative option for restoration, which relies on natural processes to take over without human intervention.
Post project monitoring was carried out in May in 1990, 1991, 1993 and 1995, as well as pre project monitoring. Results of monitoring showed nearly three times the macroinvertebrate population present post restoration. Numbers in the upstream reach which was left unaltered also increased between 1990 and 1995. Brown trout recovered to pre-restoration levels but not beyond.
The results also showed that the River Gelsa had stabilised by 1993, with changes in substrate and macroinvertebrate composition mainly taking place between 1993 and 1995. The unaltered reach also showed impressive natural recovery, indicating that the termination of maintenance practices can have a substantial effect on the stream environment. Additional of gravels would further improve the channel and could provide a very cost effective restoration strategy.
Nineteen years after restoration works were completed, hydromorphological conditions in the restored channel have developed in a very similar way to the unaltered channel. This supports the view that natural recovery without human intervention can be as effective as planned restoration.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Name | Bevtoft |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | Straightened, Over-widened |
Reference morphology | Low gradient passively meandering |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | No |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | Intensive agriculture (arable), Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 13001,300 m <br />1.3 km <br />130,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 1989/07/01 |
Works started | |
Works completed | 1989/09/01 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | more than 10000 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Construction of meanders |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | Channel naturalisation; Creation of new meandering channel |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | ceased maintenance regime |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Invertebrates: Diversity | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Improvement |
Invertebrates: Abundance | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Improvement |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information