Case study:Heiligenbergerbeek: Difference between revisions
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=In progress | |Status=In progress | ||
Line 13: | Line 7: | ||
|Contact organisation=Waterschap Vallei en Veluwe | |Contact organisation=Waterschap Vallei en Veluwe | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.vallei-veluwe.nl | |Contact organisation url=www.vallei-veluwe.nl | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Building with | |Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Building with Nature | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=The Heiligenbergerbeek is a short stream that runs between Woudenberg and Amersfoort. Its stream valley mainly receives its water from seepage from the Utrechtse Heuvelrug, an ice-pushed ridge. The Heiligenbergerbeek also receives water from the sewage plants in Ede and Veenendaal. When water levels are low, it receives water from the river Rhine to flush the canals of Amersfoort, maintain sufficiently high water levels in the agricultural areas and keep the stream flowing. To ensure the stream keeps flowing, there are several weirs present. When water levels are high, part of the water is discharged by the Vosheuvelbeek and bypasses the city of Amersfoort. To meet WFD criteria, the mowing regime was altered to main channel mowing. Additonally, the stream was made wider in several locations, to allow for wider nature-friendly banks. | |Project summary=The Heiligenbergerbeek is a short stream that runs between Woudenberg and Amersfoort. Its stream valley mainly receives its water from seepage from the Utrechtse Heuvelrug, an ice-pushed ridge. The Heiligenbergerbeek also receives water from the sewage plants in Ede and Veenendaal. When water levels are low, it receives water from the river Rhine to flush the canals of Amersfoort, maintain sufficiently high water levels in the agricultural areas and keep the stream flowing. To ensure the stream keeps flowing, there are several weirs present. When water levels are high, part of the water is discharged by the Vosheuvelbeek and bypasses the city of Amersfoort. To meet WFD criteria, the mowing regime was altered to main channel mowing. Additonally, the stream was made wider in several locations, to allow for wider nature-friendly banks. | ||
|Project title=Heiligenbergerbeek | |Project title=Heiligenbergerbeek | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case study status | |||
|Approval status=Draft | |||
}} | |||
{{Location | |||
|Location=52.10904660602447, 5.40245885011696 | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
{{Image gallery end}} | {{Image gallery end}} |
Latest revision as of 12:51, 26 September 2024
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Water quality |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Christian |
Main contact surname | Spierings |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Vallei en Veluwe |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.vallei-veluwe.nl |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Heiligenbergerbeek is a short stream that runs between Woudenberg and Amersfoort. Its stream valley mainly receives its water from seepage from the Utrechtse Heuvelrug, an ice-pushed ridge. The Heiligenbergerbeek also receives water from the sewage plants in Ede and Veenendaal. When water levels are low, it receives water from the river Rhine to flush the canals of Amersfoort, maintain sufficiently high water levels in the agricultural areas and keep the stream flowing. To ensure the stream keeps flowing, there are several weirs present. When water levels are high, part of the water is discharged by the Vosheuvelbeek and bypasses the city of Amersfoort. To meet WFD criteria, the mowing regime was altered to main channel mowing. Additonally, the stream was made wider in several locations, to allow for wider nature-friendly banks.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Lunterse Beek
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|