Case study:Deurningerbeek: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
}}
{{Location
|Location=52.31200744570342, 6.808096322741379
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Status=In progress
|Status=In progress
Line 13: Line 7:
|Contact organisation=Waterschap Vechtstromen
|Contact organisation=Waterschap Vechtstromen
|Contact organisation url=www.vechtstromen.nl
|Contact organisation url=www.vechtstromen.nl
|Name of parent multi-site project=Building with nature measures in streams
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Building with Nature
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project summary=The Deurningerbeek is a tribuatary of the Oude Bornsche Beek, which is in turn a tribuatary of the Linderbeek. This stream is already a site for traditional stream restoration. The bed was realigned to a meandering trajectory. In addition, the water authority wants to experiment with a thirty year suspension of maintenance.
|Project summary=The Deurningerbeek is a tribuatary of the Oude Bornsche Beek, which is in turn a tribuatary of the Linderbeek. This stream is already a site for traditional stream restoration. The bed was realigned to a meandering trajectory. In addition, the water authority wants to experiment with a thirty year suspension of maintenance.
|Monitoring surveys and results=Water quality indicators are monitored for compliance with Water Framework Directive goals. In addition, the hydrological and ecological effects are monitored as part of the 'Building with Nature in streams' project.
|Monitoring surveys and results=Water quality indicators are monitored for compliance with Water Framework Directive goals. In addition, the hydrological and ecological effects are monitored as part of the 'Building with Nature in streams' project.
So far, suspended maintenance has led to the establishment of an alder carr (Dutch: Elzenbroekbos). It is likely that the dry summers of 2018 and 2019 have caused some ecological damage due to the stream running dry.
So far, suspended maintenance has led to the establishment of an alder carr (Dutch: Elzenbroekbos). It is likely that the dry summers of 2018 and 2019 have caused some ecological damage due to the stream running dry.
|Project title=Deurningerbeek
|Project title=Deurningerbeek
}}
}}
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
}}
{{Location
|Location=52.31200744570342, 6.808096322741379
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}

Latest revision as of 12:41, 26 September 2024


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
Country Netherlands
Main contact forename Maarten
Main contact surname Zonderwijk
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Waterschap Vechtstromen
Contact organisation web site http://www.vechtstromen.nl
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Building with Nature

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Deurningerbeek is a tribuatary of the Oude Bornsche Beek, which is in turn a tribuatary of the Linderbeek. This stream is already a site for traditional stream restoration. The bed was realigned to a meandering trajectory. In addition, the water authority wants to experiment with a thirty year suspension of maintenance.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Water quality indicators are monitored for compliance with Water Framework Directive goals. In addition, the hydrological and ecological effects are monitored as part of the 'Building with Nature in streams' project.

So far, suspended maintenance has led to the establishment of an alder carr (Dutch: Elzenbroekbos). It is likely that the dry summers of 2018 and 2019 have caused some ecological damage due to the stream running dry.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 18' 43.23" N, 6° 48' 29.15" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Rijn
River basin Rijndelta

Subcatchment

River name Vecht
Area category 1000 - 10000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Siliceous, Organic
Ecoregion Central Plains
Dominant land cover Grassland, Intensive agriculture (arable), Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural)
Waterbody ID NL36_OWM_014



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beentjesgraven, Beneden Regge, De Doorbraak, Dinkel Noord, Jufferbeek, Living Vechte-Dinkel, Marswetering, Midden Regge, Oude Bornschebeek, Oude Diep... further results


Site

Name Deurningerbeek
WFD water body codes NL05_Oudebornschebeek
WFD (national) typology R5
WFD water body name Oude Bornsche Beek
Pre-project morphology Straightened
Reference morphology Actively meandering
Desired post project morphology Straightened
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Sand
River corridor land use Grassland
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information