Case study:Hooge Raam: Difference between revisions
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
|Dominant substrate=Sand, | |Dominant substrate=Sand, | ||
|River corridor land use=Intensive agriculture (arable), | |River corridor land use=Intensive agriculture (arable), | ||
|Average bankfull channel width category=5 - 10 m | |||
|Avrg bankfull channel width=7 | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=Less than 0.5 m | |||
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=0.3 | |||
|Mean discharge category=0.1 - 1.0 m³/s | |||
|Mn discharge=0.2 | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} |
Revision as of 11:57, 19 April 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Hydromorphology |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Bram |
Main contact surname | Spierings |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Aa en Maas |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.aaenmaas.nl |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Hooge Raam is a tributary of the Lage Raam stream. It is a fast-flowing stream in a mostly natural area. After deepening and weir construction, the waterway had become too wide and too deep for its discharge. Fifteen years ago, maintenance was suspended. A new bed was dug out, in which the stream was allowed to meander. In parts of the stream, dead branches and trunks were introduced. In other parts, trees were planted along the banks to provide shade.
Monitoring surveys and results
The outlet of the stream has become richer in great manna grass and sludge. The stream remains within its planned meandering zone. The lower temperature proves suitable for species that prefer higher flow velocities, like fish and dragonflies.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beek Lage Raam, Beekherstel Lactariabeek, Lactariabeek, Oeffeltse Raam, Tovensche Beek
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|