Case study:'t Merkske: Difference between revisions
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
|WFD (national) typology=R4a | |WFD (national) typology=R4a | ||
|WFD water body name=Merkske | |WFD water body name=Merkske | ||
|Pre-project morphology=Actively meandering, | |||
|Reference morphology=Actively meandering, | |||
|Desired post project morphology=Actively meandering, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |Heavily modified water body=No | ||
|Protected species present=No | |Protected species present=No | ||
|Invasive species present=No | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|Dominant substrate=Sand, | |Dominant substrate=Sand, | ||
|River corridor land use=Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), | |||
|Mean discharge category=0.1 - 1.0 m³/s | |Mean discharge category=0.1 - 1.0 m³/s | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 13:45, 13 April 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Water quality |
Country | Belgium, Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Martin |
Main contact surname | Stamhuis |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Brabantse Delta |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.brabantsedelta.nl |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Het Merkske is a river in a southern tip of the Dutch province Noord-Brabant and forms part of the border with Belgium. This area has an important ecological function and is home to large numbers of river animals.
Further improvement of the river's ecological quality has been pursued through Building with Nature measures. Regular maintenance of the river's edges has been suspended so that branches and fallen trees remain in or near the stream, as long as this does not impede the flow too much.
Additonally, dead wood has been introduced at fifteen locations, in various forms: branches, stubs and trunks.
Monitoring surveys and results
There is an undeniable positive effect on stream ecology, with macroinvertebrates conforming to a Good Ecological Status. In 2018, the number of fish was still lower than would be expected for a stream with a Good Ecological Status.
Local backwater effects have been observed, with water levels locally rising about 5 cm. These effects quickly diminish in the upstream direction and are confined to the natural areas.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: 't Merkske, Bijloop
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|