Case study:De Doorbraak: Difference between revisions
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site | ||
|Name=Doorbraak | |||
|WFD water body code=NL05_Exoscheaa | |||
|WFD (national) typology=R6 | |||
|WFD water body name=Exosche Aa_Doorbraak | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} |
Revision as of 10:18, 10 March 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.vechtstromen.nl/buurt/gemeenten/almelo/doorbraak/ |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Maarten |
Main contact surname | Zonderwijk |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Vechtstromen |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.vechtstromen.nl |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
De Doorbraak is a newly created stream near Almelo. Its creations has several purposes. In terms of water quantity, the stream helps create more space for inundation, so that there is less of a need to discharge water out of the area. This is supposed to help retain more water in the region in wet periods and prevent drought in dry periods. De Doorbraak is also part of a plan to improve the water quality of the Regge basin. It contributes to a separation of urban and rural waters, so that less polluted water ends up in the Regge. Finally, it provides and ecological link between Twente in the northeast and the hills of the Sallandse Heuvelrug in the southwest. The topsoil of this stream valley was removed over a length of 13 km and a width of 50 m. This created a large area that the stream can inundate. Abandoned meanders and pools were conncted to the main stream. Vegetation removal is managed by grazers, with additonal mowing, if necessary.
Monitoring surveys and results
The bank vegetation is developing well and resembles wetland vegetation. The exotic plant Crassula helmsii poses a risk, as it might dominate other species. So far, grazers have not been sufficient for removing undesirable vegetation. Trees need to be cut regularly.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|