Case study:Pow Burn Restoration Project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|Funding sources=SEPA Water Environment Fund | |Funding sources=SEPA Water Environment Fund | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Improving hydromorphological condition | |||
|Biological quality elements=Improved habitat for SAC designated species (salmon, otter) | |||
|Other motivation=Reducing flood risk | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} |
Revision as of 22:40, 19 January 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture |
Country | Scotland |
Main contact forename | Charlie |
Main contact surname | Perfect |
Main contact user ID | User:Charlie |
Contact organisation | SEPA |
Contact organisation web site | http://https://www.sepa.org.uk/environment/water/water-environment-fund/ |
Partner organisations | Esk Rivers and Fisheries Trust |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The project aimed to restore natural processes along the Pow Burn between Farnell and Powmouth. The river had been straightened and extensively dredged. Arable land use encroached extensively on the river corridor. Restoration measures included 1) Restoration of an inset riparian corridor by moving back embankments and creating a multi stage channel with the aim of encouraging frequent out of channel flow supporting natural riparian habitats 2) Installation of flow deflectors to create hydraulic diversity driving geomorphic adjustment of the channel form. 3) Excavation of backwater channels and flood relief channels to take pressure off the main channel and increase ecological interactions between the river and riparian zones. The project was led by the Esk Rivers and Fisheries Trust (ERFT) and funded by the SEPA Water Environment Fund (WEF)
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|