Case study:Vlier: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=51.47618451658608, 5.778814238978085 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Vlier |Status=In progress |Themes=...")
 
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Site}}
{{Site
|Name=Vlier
|WFD water body code=NL38_4E
|WFD (national) typology=R4
|WFD water body name=Bakelse Aa, Oude Aa en Kaweise Loop
|Pre-project morphology=Straightened,
|Reference morphology=Low gradient passively meandering,
|Desired post project morphology=Straightened,
|Heavily modified water body=Yes
|Protected species present=No
|Invasive species present=No
|Dominant substrate=Sand
|River corridor land use=Intensive agriculture (arable),
}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Motivations}}

Revision as of 13:56, 16 December 2020

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 28' 34.26" N, 5° 46' 43.73" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
Country Netherlands
Main contact forename Bram
Main contact surname Spierings
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Waterschap Aa en Maas
Contact organisation web site http://www.aaenmaas.nl
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Building with nature measures in streams

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Vlier
WFD water body codes NL38_4E
WFD (national) typology R4
WFD water body name Bakelse Aa, Oude Aa en Kaweise Loop
Pre-project morphology Straightened
Reference morphology Low gradient passively meandering
Desired post project morphology Straightened
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Sand
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable)
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information