Case study:River Avon Our Water Environment: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
|File name=FordmouthPlanting&LogRevetMar20.jpg | |File name=FordmouthPlanting&LogRevetMar20.jpg | ||
|Caption=Riparian planting on reinstated ground above log revetment, showing root plates visible along river edge | |Caption=Riparian planting on reinstated ground above log revetment, showing root plates visible along river edge | ||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=2017 Fordmouth River Avon before 8 v3.JPG | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery end}} | {{Image gallery end}} |
Revision as of 17:33, 3 September 2020
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Water quality |
Country | Scotland |
Main contact forename | Jos |
Main contact surname | Milner |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Tomintoul & Glenlivet Landscape Partnership |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.tomintoulandglenlivet.com/our-water-environment/ |
Partner organisations | Spey Fisheries Board, Cairngorms National Park Authority, Crown Estate Scotland, Delnabo Estate, Fordmouth Farm |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
River restoration works have been carried out along a high-energy reach of the River Avon within the River Spey Special Area of Conservation (SAC) in Cairngorms National Park. The project encompasses green engineering woody structures and sediment management, as well as water margin management and riparian planting. The aim is to improve the capability of the watercourse to cope with high flow events, reduce excessive erosion and to protect in-channel and riparian habitats, as well as farm livelihoods and infrastructure. The works were carried out as a Scottish Rural Development Programme (SRDP) Agri-Environment Climate Scheme (AECS), supported and managed by a National Lottery Heritage Funded partnership (Tomintoul & Glenlivet Landscape Partnership) as part of their wider ‘Our Water Environment’ project running across the Tomintoul and Glenlivet area.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Cash flow is an issue as sizable sums required up front – project partner supported cash flow but the project could have been wider-reaching without this problem.
Significant up-front investment is required to carry out initial survey work required to be able to inform land owners / managers about risks involved and allow them to decide if this is something they can accommodate.
Lack of understanding about green engineering techniques means significant engagement is required early on to gain buy-in & permissions.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Allt Lorgy River Restoration
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|