Case study:Hofstadelva: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
|Specific mitigation=Mitigating river environment following embankments for erosion control | |Specific mitigation=Mitigating river environment following embankments for erosion control | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank stabilisation, | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Channelling | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} |
Latest revision as of 13:49, 11 February 2020
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management |
Country | Norway |
Main contact forename | Mads |
Main contact surname | Johnsen |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.nve.no |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Hofstadelva is a small side-river in a larger river system of Stjørdalselva. Due to risk of avalanche and erosion large sections of embarkments are established along both sides of Hofstadelva. Mitigation efforts included shaping of the embarkments to mimic the original stream structure, topsoil and turf transplants are used to improve natural vegetation recovery along the river.
Monitoring surveys and results
A monitoring program for fish, benthos, plant life and birds during 2016 - 2018. Natural recovery is observed for all species groups. Grazing domestic animals cause some erosion that limit establishment of forest, and soil erosion into the river might be limiting for benthos.
Lessons learnt
Pre-project studies and cooperation have been important for the output. The involvemnt of experts in early phases of the projects have improved the positiv effects of mitigation. Mapping of species and ecosystem variables before the contruction is valuabel reference state for the monitoring after implementation.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|