Case study:Restoration in Bognelva: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 99: Line 99:
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
{{Other responses header}}
{{Other responses header}}
{{Other response table row
|Element=Birds
|Monitored before=Yes
|Monitored after=Yes
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=No
|Result=Inconclusive
}}
{{Other response table row
|Element=Increased recreation
|Monitored before=No
|Monitored after=Yes
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=No
|Result=Improvement
}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Monitoring documents}}

Revision as of 15:16, 6 December 2019

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 69° 57' 7.06" N, 22° 23' 10.31" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes
Country Norway
Main contact forename Knut Aune
Main contact surname Hoseth
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE)
Contact organisation web site http://www.nve.no
Partner organisations NMBU and NaturRestaurering
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Massive reconstruction of the lower 3,5 km of the Bogn river, including canalization and structural modifications to the main river and side channels the last 100 years had negative impact on landscape, biodiversity and productive populations of anadromous fish. The disappearance of fish led to local interests among fishermen, farmers and landowners to restore the river. Since numerous restoration measures were planned and implemented. The main aims was to restore the natural dynamics and diversity of the river system and its interactions with the surrounding valley. Since 2005, side channels and tributaries have been re-opened and re-established, habitat improvements such as pools and channels have been re-created, and scientific studies have been initiated for investigating the before and after situation for fish populations and biodiversity. Importantly, a strong and active local engagement has secured the success of this project.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Habitat diversity, bird species, fish densities are included. Improved fish density and catchment.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Make a good story and go for it. Involvement and local engagement is the key to success.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Bognelva
WFD water body codes 211.8Z
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Bognelva
Pre-project morphology Channelled river
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology Meandering river
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest different fish species
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 35003,500 m <br />3.5 km <br />350,000 cm <br />
Project started 2003
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€) 8080 k€ <br />80,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE)

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design NVE Knut Aune Hoseth
Stakeholder engagement and communication Langfjordbotn JFF Bjørn O. Dønnum
Works and works supervision NMBU / NaturRestaurering Jonathan E. Colman
Post-project management and maintenance NVE
Monitoring NMBU / Naturrestaurering



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology The channelled river led to disapperance of fish
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Channel pattern/planform Yes Yes Yes No No Improvement
Quantity & dynamics of flow Yes Yes Yes No No Improvement
Structure & condition of riparian/lake shore zones Yes Yes Yes No No Improvement

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes Yes No Yes No Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Birds Yes Yes Yes No No Inconclusive
Increased recreation No Yes Yes No No Improvement


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information