Case study:Gilev's Grove reconstruction: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 92: Line 92:
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Site}}
{{Site
|Name=the Gilev's Grove
|WFD water body name=Klyuchi stream
|Pre-project morphology=fluvial
|Reference morphology=fluvial
|Desired post project morphology=fluvial
|Heavily modified water body=No
|Local site designation=local recreation place
|Protected species present=No
|Invasive species present=No
|Dominant hydrology=brook, small stream
|Dominant substrate=Sand, Clay,
|River corridor land use=parklands fofrest
|Average bankfull channel width category=2 - 5 m
|Average bankfull channel depth category=Less than 0.5 m
|Mean discharge category=Less than 0.1 m³/s
|Average channel gradient category=0.001 - 0.01
}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Motivations}}

Revision as of 11:50, 25 February 2019

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

4.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 57° 7' 29.19" N, 65° 38' 3.20" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site http://https://72.ru/text/gorod/294961606352896.html
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Spatial planning, Water quality
Country Russia
Main contact forename Timur
Main contact surname Pavluk
Main contact user ID User:T.Pavluk
Contact organisation RosNIIVH
Contact organisation web site http://wrm.ru
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
General scheme of the Gilev's Grove

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Reconstruction of a unique forest park, which is located between two water objects - the Klyuchi stream and Lake Krivoe - began in 2015 and ended in November of 2016. Objectives to be achieved: 1) Protection and restoration of the Klyuchi stream valley. The workers stabilized about 23 thousand square meters of slopes and re-designed the bed of the Klyuchi stream. New bridge-passage was built over the stream in the grove. After restoration works completion the unpleasant smell from the Klyuchi stream in the forest park was not traced anymore. 2) Allocation of entertainment facilities: large picnic mangal-barbeque zone. 19 arbors were installed along the stream. Swings were mounted for kids between arbors. Sanitation facilities were put nearby as well. 3) Installation of new playgrounds for children. They are designed for children of different ages and different interests. There are sandboxes and swings for toddlers and various sports equipment for tinagers. Comfortable benches installed carefully for parents throughout the gaming area. 4) Gilev's Grove had been and remains a great place for sports. In winter time there is a hockey box and illuminated ski track. In warm season active leisure lovers will enjoy a pleasant cycle path and six playgrounds for sports. People with pleasure ride on rollers, scooters, skateboards, bicycles and even roller skis, run and do Scandinavian walking. 5) For nature lovers the birds watch zone is equipped on the shore of Lake Krivoe. This part of the Grove is rarely crowded. Only birds singing violates silence of the beautiful view of the lake here. 6) Grove is a great place for photo shoots. Especially for the newlyweds, who often come here to capture the happy moments of their lives, an admiring white open-air pavilion not far from the central entrance was installed. 7) After reconstruction, figures of various animals appeared in the Gilev's Grove. The sculptures are very popular among children. 8) Park territory became as comfortable, as safe. On the territory 427 lanterns and more than 200 surveillance cameras were installed. Throughout the entire walking routes, new benches and litter bins were allocated. 9) Tyumen residents who came to the Grove by car, no longer need to worry about parking. New parking place was arranged for 468 cars.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Klyuchi stream rehabilitation
rehabilitation technical works -2
rehabilitation technical works -3
stream banks strengthening
stream bed cleaning
Children playground
Wild animals sculptures
White admiring open-air pavilion
Watching pavilion
Barbeque place
Scandinavian walking
New bridge over the brook
Online security cameras
The Klyuchi stream restoration
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name the Gilev's Grove
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Klyuchi stream
Pre-project morphology fluvial
Reference morphology fluvial
Desired post project morphology fluvial
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations local recreation place
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology brook, small stream
Dominant substrate Sand, Clay
River corridor land use parklands fofrest
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category Less than 0.5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category Less than 0.1 m³/s
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category 0.001 - 0.01
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information