Case study:Adare Fish Counter: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status}}
{{Location}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
Line 21: Line 23:
Local recording of water levels allowed efficient project planning in the advent of high river flows (waterlevel.ie).
Local recording of water levels allowed efficient project planning in the advent of high river flows (waterlevel.ie).
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Site}}
{{Project background}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Measures}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{Biological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{Other responses header}}
{{End table}}
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents end}}
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references footer}}
{{Supplementary Information}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Revision as of 15:29, 21 June 2017

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Social benefits
Country Ireland
Main contact forename Tony
Main contact surname Brew
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site http://opw.ie
Partner organisations IFI
Parent multi-site project

Environmental River Enhancement Programme

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Poured counter beds

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This project is to facilitate the re-opening of the Maigue Salmon fishery, by producing statistical evidence to allow accurate estimates of fish stocks.This project was carried out in-conjunction with OPW & IFI.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Monitoring of fish stocks are ongoing.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Stakeholder consultation and partnership critical for project success. Resourcing the project with the most experienced staff ensured success. Sequencing of work critical. Specialist concrete saw facilitated retaining a significant section of the existing weir. This retained good reference and control points for accurate setting out.Future maintenance issues should be given due consideration in the design process. Detailed pre-works survey and design drawings critical to efficient planning and project delivery. Local recording of water levels allowed efficient project planning in the advent of high river flows (waterlevel.ie).


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information