Case study:RESTORATION OF THE GORIŠKI BREŽIČEK STREAM: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 189: Line 189:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Bank and bed modifications measure=excavation in the U form,construction of small wooden weir to prevent uncontrolled deepening,coves and bays construction
   
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of a flood expansion area,
   
|Planform / Channel pattern=re-instatement of old course,introducing sinuosity
      excavation in the U form,construction of small wooden weir to prevent uncontrolled deepening,coves and bays construction
|Floodplain / River corridor=
      bigger flood area
|Planform / Channel pattern=
      re-instatement of old course,introducing sinuosity
|Other technical measure=
     
|Management interventions=
     
|Social measures=
     
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
     
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}

Revision as of 11:26, 31 May 2017

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes
Country Slovenia
Main contact forename Tanja
Main contact surname Vasilevska
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Notranjski regijski park
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin Sava River

Subcatchment

River name Goriški Brežiček
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 500 - 1000 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Organic (i.e. Peat), Calcareous
Ecoregion Dinaric Western Balkan
Dominant land cover Wetland, Extensive agriculture, Woodland
Waterbody ID



Site

Name watercourses Goriški Brežiček
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology SI141VT2 VTJ Cerkniško jezero (Cerknica lake)
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Straight
Reference morphology Sinuous, Higher groundwater level
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation EU - Special Area of Conservation
Local/regional site designations Ramsar
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Ephemeral
Dominant substrate Silt, Sand, Gravel
River corridor land use Wetland, Extensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 0.160.16 m³/s <br />160 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2007/01/01
Works started
Works completed 2009/12/01
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Notranjska Regional Park, Municipality of Cerknica, Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Notranjska Regional Park
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision TGM Bizjak
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications excavation in the U form, construction of small wooden weir to prevent uncontrolled deepening, coves and bays construction
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of a flood expansion area
Planform / Channel pattern re-instatement of old course, introducing sinuosity
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information