Case study:Enler River enhancement project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location}} {{Project overview |Project title=Enler River enhancement project |Status=Complete |Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and bi...")
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Location}}
{{Location}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Enler River enhancement project
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Line 12: Line 11:
|Main contact id=Judithbankhead
|Main contact id=Judithbankhead
|Contact organisation=Rivers Agency, Northern Ireland (DARDNI)
|Contact organisation=Rivers Agency, Northern Ireland (DARDNI)
|Contact organisation url=www.dardni.gov.uk/rivers
|Partner organisations=Rivers Agency, DCAL Inland Fisheries, Castlereagh Borough Council
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=P4180319.JPG
|Picture description=finished reach Enler River
|Project summary=The Enler River is a typical arterially drained channel with laminar flow, regular depth and silt deposition.  Compensation money from a fish kill prosecution allowed fishery enhancement measures to be planned and implemented. These included deflector groynes to narrow the channel and creat a thalweg, addition of spawning gravels and plums, and the creation of deeper water via a small cross river groyne
|Monitoring surveys and results=Pre works fishery assessment and river habitat assessment were carried out, along with photographs.  Post works photographs have been taken and this will continue.  One year plus fishery assessment and habitat assessment planned for 2015.
|Lessons learn=Opportunisitc work due to compensation monies and public land ownership.  The proximity of the Greenway cycle way, and high value market gardening land meant that the reach length had to be limited, and work constrained within the current channel dimensions.  Lunkers that had been obtained for inlcusion in the scheme could not be used due to size issues - used elsewhere.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Revision as of 10:34, 25 February 2015

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country Northern Ireland
Main contact forename Judith
Main contact surname Bankhead
Main contact user ID User:Judithbankhead
Contact organisation Rivers Agency, Northern Ireland (DARDNI)
Contact organisation web site http://www.dardni.gov.uk/rivers
Partner organisations Rivers Agency, DCAL Inland Fisheries, Castlereagh Borough Council
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
finished reach Enler River

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Enler River is a typical arterially drained channel with laminar flow, regular depth and silt deposition. Compensation money from a fish kill prosecution allowed fishery enhancement measures to be planned and implemented. These included deflector groynes to narrow the channel and creat a thalweg, addition of spawning gravels and plums, and the creation of deeper water via a small cross river groyne

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Pre works fishery assessment and river habitat assessment were carried out, along with photographs. Post works photographs have been taken and this will continue. One year plus fishery assessment and habitat assessment planned for 2015.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Opportunisitc work due to compensation monies and public land ownership. The proximity of the Greenway cycle way, and high value market gardening land meant that the reach length had to be limited, and work constrained within the current channel dimensions. Lunkers that had been obtained for inlcusion in the scheme could not be used due to size issues - used elsewhere.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information