Case study:Avon Barriers Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
|Project summary=The Avon Barriers project is a partnership project between the Rivers & Fisheries Trust for Scotland (RAFTS), SEPA, South Lanarkshire Council and the Clyde River Foundation. It seeks to open up fish passage across two weirs on the Avon Water. The project is currently at the end of the feasibility & optioneering phase and is currently in a review period to select the best option for both weirs from those identified, to proceed to design and build.
|Project summary=The Avon Barriers project is a partnership project between the Rivers & Fisheries Trust for Scotland (RAFTS), SEPA, South Lanarkshire Council and the Clyde River Foundation. It seeks to open up fish passage across two weirs on the Avon Water. The project is currently at the end of the feasibility & optioneering phase and is currently in a review period to select the best option for both weirs from those identified, to proceed to design and build.


This project has been funded through the Water Environment Fund (WEF) administered by SEPA on behalf of the Scottish Government, with contribution from South Lanarkshire Council. THe project has been managed by RAFTS.
This project has been funded through the Water Environment Fund (WEF) administered by SEPA on behalf of the Scottish Government, with contribution from South Lanarkshire Council. The project has been managed by RAFTS.


By opening up fish passage across these two weirs almost 35km of salmonid spawning habitat will be accessable, improving the regeneration of the Clyde catchment as a valuable salmon fishery.
By opening up fish passage across these two weirs almost 35km of salmonid spawning habitat will be accessable, improving the regeneration of the Clyde catchment as a valuable salmon fishery.


For further information please examine the individual barrier project pages for Fernegair Weir and Millheugh Weir.
For further information on the Water Environment Fund please visit: http://www.sepa.org.uk/water/water_environment_fund.aspx
 
For further information on the project please examine the individual barrier project pages for Fernegair Weir and Millheugh Weir.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Revision as of 16:13, 20 February 2015

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 55° 46' 2.99" N, 4° 1' 23.47" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity
Country Scotland
Main contact forename Alan
Main contact surname McCulloch
Main contact user ID User:Alan.McCulloch
Contact organisation Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA)
Contact organisation web site http://www.sepa.org.uk
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Avon Barriers Project: Ferengair Weir
Fernegair Weir

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Avon Barriers project is a partnership project between the Rivers & Fisheries Trust for Scotland (RAFTS), SEPA, South Lanarkshire Council and the Clyde River Foundation. It seeks to open up fish passage across two weirs on the Avon Water. The project is currently at the end of the feasibility & optioneering phase and is currently in a review period to select the best option for both weirs from those identified, to proceed to design and build.

This project has been funded through the Water Environment Fund (WEF) administered by SEPA on behalf of the Scottish Government, with contribution from South Lanarkshire Council. The project has been managed by RAFTS.

By opening up fish passage across these two weirs almost 35km of salmonid spawning habitat will be accessable, improving the regeneration of the Clyde catchment as a valuable salmon fishery.

For further information on the Water Environment Fund please visit: http://www.sepa.org.uk/water/water_environment_fund.aspx

For further information on the project please examine the individual barrier project pages for Fernegair Weir and Millheugh Weir.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information