Case study:Tungelroyse beek

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00

(0 votes)

To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.

Location: 51° 14' 40.73" N, 5° 50' 33.48" E

Edit location

Loading map...

{"format":"googlemaps3","type":"HYBRID","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"limit":50,"offset":0,"link":"all","sort":[""],"order":[],"headers":"show","mainlabel":"","intro":"","outro":"","searchlabel":"... further results","default":"","import-annotation":false,"width":"auto","height":"400px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"visitedicon":"","wmsoverlay":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"cluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[""],"searchmarkers":"","fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"showtitle":false,"hidenamespace":true,"template":"Location map popup","userparam":"","activeicon":"","pagelabel":false,"ajaxcoordproperty":"","ajaxquery":"","locations":[{"text":"\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Title:\u003C/b\u003E Tungelroyse beek\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003ECountry:\u003C/b\u003E \u003Ca href=\"/wiki/index.php?title=Netherlands\" title=\"Netherlands\"\u003ENetherlands\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Status:\u003C/b\u003E Complete\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EThemes:\u003C/b\u003E Land use management - agriculture\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E","title":"Tungelroyse beek","link":"","lat":51.244646685018,"lon":5.842632294225,"icon":"/wiki/images/a/af/Red_marker.png"}]}

Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.

Project overview

Edit project overview

Status	Complete
Project web site	http://www.wpm.nl/projecten/@179811/leudal/
Themes	Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture
Country	Netherlands
Main contact forename	Twan
Main contact surname	van Dijck
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation	Waterschap Peel en Maasvallei
Contact organisation web site	http://www.wpm.nl/projecten/@179811/leudal/
Partner organisations	see description
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects	No

Birds eye view of the Tungelroysebeek after completion (source: Waterschap Peels en Maasvallei)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.

For 35 kilometers the Tungelroyse beek flows through the middle of Limburg province, through the municipalities of Weert, Nederweert and Leudal. The stream originates at Budel in the province of North Brabant and discharges near Neerbeek into the Meuse as the Neer stream. For years the stream had been straightened to direct discharges into the Meuse quickly. Over time, with changes land use the water level became unfitting. Moreoverby discharges of substances such as zinc and cadmium had polluted the stream considerably.

In 1999, the Water Board Peel en Maas vallei (Peel and Meuse valley) decided to one of the largest brook restorations projects in the Netherlands, and started the reorganization and restructuring of the Tungelroyse beek. Over course of 12 years and over a length of 30 kilometers work was phased and resulted in bringing back the original meanders, remove contaminated soil, adjust the water level, reduce the number of sewer overflows, improve the quality of life and recreational opportunities, improve conditions for agriculture and contributed to the national ecological network.

Now, the Tungelroyse beek is again a beautiful meandering stream and a habitat for many plants and animals.

A great number of partners was involved in this project: the province of Limburg, the municipalities Leudal, Nederweert, Weert, nature organisations Staatsbosbeheer, NatuurMonumenten, and Stichting LimburgsLandschap. Also the Government Service for Land and Water Management (Dienst Landelijk Gebied), LLTB-Limburg, the IVN, the local anglers association, farmers and private land owners were involved.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Image gallery

Edit Image gallery

Catchment and subcatchment Select a catchment/subcatchment Edit the catchment and subcatchment details (affects all case studies in this subcatchment) Catchment River basin district Meuse River basin Meuse Subcatchment River name Meuse Area category more than 10000 km² Area (km2) 465465 km² <br />46,500 ha <br /> Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m Maximum altitude (m) 200200 m <br />0.2 km <br />20,000 cm <br /> Dominant geology chalk and loess Ecoregion Western Plains Dominant land cover Intensive agriculture, Urban Waterbody ID Other case studies in this subcatchment: Aaijen- Removal of bank fixation, Meers - Floodplain lowering, Reméandration du Geer à Grand-Axhe, Rijkelse Bemden - River bed widening, Voorste Nete at Dessel Site Edit site Name Tungelroyse beek WFD water body codes WFD (national) typology WFD water body name Pre-project morphology Reference morphology Desired post project morphology Heavily modified water body Yes National/international site designation Local/regional site designations Protected species present No Invasive species present No Species of interest Dominant hydrology Dominant substrate River corridor land use Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture Average bankfull channel width category Average bankfull channel width (m) Average bankfull channel depth category Average bankfull channel depth (m) Mean discharge category Mean annual discharge (m3/s) Average channel gradient category Average channel gradient Average unit stream power (W/m2) Project background Edit project background Reach length directly affected (m) 30 km30,000 m <br />3,000,000 cm <br /> Project started 1999/01/01 Works started Works completed Project completed 2011/01/01 Total cost category 10 - 50 k€ Total cost (k€) 3030 k€ <br />30,000 € <br /> Benefit to cost ratio Funding sources Regeling Actief Bodembeheer de Kempen paid for most of the pollution clean up, RRestoration works was paid for by a number of nature funds: SGB-regeling, ILG-regeling, EU Interreg, Provincie Limburg, Beekmondingenconvenant RWS, Alterra Cost for project phases Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname Investigation and design Stakeholder engagement and communication Works and works supervision Post-project management and maintenance Monitoring Reasons for river restoration Edit reasons for restoration Mitigation of a pressure Pollution incident, Land drainage, Barriers to fish migration, low ground water table Hydromorphology Channel pattern/planform Biology Physico-chemical Specific non-synthetic pollutants Other reasons for the project Measures Edit Measures Structural measures Bank/bed modifications Floodplain / River corridor Planform / Channel pattern Other Non-structural measures Management interventions Social measures (incl. engagement) Other Monitoring Hydromorphological quality elements Edit Hydromorphological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Biological quality elements Edit biological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Physico-chemical quality elements Edit Physico-chemical quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic Edit Other responses Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Monitoring documents Upload monitoring documents Additional documents and videos Upload additional documents A video of the Tungelroysebeek by the waterboard Additional links and references Edit links and references Link Description Supplementary Information Edit Supplementary Information