Case study:Wettingen, nature-like fish pass: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location |
Latest revision as of 11:02, 26 September 2013
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Economic aspects, Fisheries, Hydropower |
Country | Switzerland |
Main contact forename | Walter |
Main contact surname | Binder |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
In Wettingen there is a great example of a small nature-like bypass channel at the weir Wettingen on the Limmat downstream from Zurich which surmounts the very big height of 18.30 m. Nature-like bypass channels total length is 620 m, discharge 0.4 m³/s and additional attraction water is 0.6 m³/s. Total difference in water level is 18.30 m with high mean slope 3 %.The lower section consists of a technical fish.
Whereas a near-nature water course was formed in the upper section, a rocky-cascade fishway with a height of 10 meters surmounts the biggest part of the altitude. Due to the limited space the
lower section consists of a vertical-slot-pass which is converted into a collection-gallery at the power house.
Leading back the water course to the power house is not possiblewhen it comes to bigger bypass channels.
Splitting the water into two branches offers a good solution for this small channel. The main branch continues towards the tailwater as a near-nature water course and ends further downstream, where a connection to the natural river bed is possible. The smaller second branch diverts from the main branch towards the power house and is formed as a vertical slot-pass.
The nature-like bypass channel has a trail on its side, so the residents can enjoy the lovely scenery and see some trouts when passing by.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|