Case study:Morava restoration project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 81: Line 81:
        
        
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=
|Reach length directly affected=16000 m
   
|Works started=2005/04/01
   
      16000 m
|Project started=
     
|Works started=
      1999/1995/01/01/01
|Works completed=
|Works completed=
      2006/1997/01/01/01
|Project completed=
|Project completed=
     
|Total cost category=1000 - 5000 k€
|Total cost category=
|Funding sources=World Bank
      1000 - 5000 k€
|Total1 cost=
     
|Funding sources=
      World Bank
|Investigation and design cost category=
     
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
     
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
     
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
     
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
     
|Wrk and supervision cost=
     
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
     
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
     
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
     
|Monitoring1 cost category=
     
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
     
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
     
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
     
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations

Revision as of 02:51, 9 September 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 48° 20' 32.39" N, 16° 52' 12.70" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Water quality
Country Austria, Slovakia
Main contact forename Michael
Main contact surname Stelzhammer
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation WWF Austria
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Morava River is the largest left-side tributary to the Upper Danube. There have been a number of restoration projects and implementation measures which aim to restore natural river dynamics and promote appropriate land-use practices within a sensitive floodplain environment.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin Morava

Subcatchment

River name Morava
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Alps
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Site

Name Morava
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Straight
Reference morphology Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations Montreaux list
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off, Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate Gravel, Bedrock
River corridor land use Extensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 16000 m16 km <br />1,600,000 cm <br />
Project started
Works started 2005/04/01
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 1000 - 5000 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources World Bank

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Continuity for organisms, Continuity of sediment transport
Biology Fish: Abundance, Fish: Species composition
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Flood risk management, Community demand


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Creation of groynes, Creation of deflectors
Floodplain / River corridor Dyke relocation, Increase water retention area
Planform / Channel pattern Re-connection of river channels, Introducing sinuosity, Meanders reopened
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Land purchase
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Abundance Yes Yes Improvement
Fish: Species composition Yes Yes Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Public awareness of river Yes Yes Improvement


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDYQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.danubeparks.org%2Ffiles%2F1594 MoravaRevitalization KHolubova.pdf&ei=V-YqUtjGNMHcswbf5IDYBQ&usg=AFQjCNFtlC9F5wG0k7-3BJFhgbJBvsCS7g&sig2=EfLe- iGvPMPqEmCLXaYkw&bvm=bv.51773540,d.Yms talk by Katarina Holubova and Franz Steiner
http://www.ramsar.org/pdf/lib/hbk4-07cs20.pdf Jan Seffer and Viera Stanova Paper on the restoration
http://http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm?fuseaction=search.dspPage&n proj id=4070#EI EU life webpage

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information