Case study:Černý potok stream restoration scheme: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
|Picture description=Centra part of the stream restoration
|Picture description=Centra part of the stream restoration
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=P1040623.JPG
|Caption=excavation of the new channel
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=P1040802.JPG
|Caption=excavation site
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=P1040608.JPG
|Caption=filling up the small "dams" in the deepened channel
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=P1050177.JPG
|Caption=winter higher flow
}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=Müglitz
|Subcatchment=Müglitz
Line 78: Line 99:
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=P1040623.JPG
|Caption=excavation of the new channel
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=P1040802.JPG
|Caption=excavation site
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=P1040608.JPG
|Caption=filling up the small "dams" in the deepened channel
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=P1050177.JPG
|Caption=winter higher flow
}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Case study documents
{{Case study documents
Line 105: Line 108:
{{Additional links and references footer}}
{{Additional links and references footer}}
{{Supplementary Information}}
{{Supplementary Information}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Revision as of 18:25, 6 September 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 44' 3.81" N, 13° 53' 29.49" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Spatial planning, Water quality
Country Czech Republic
Main contact forename Rous
Main contact surname Vít
Main contact user ID User:VRous
Contact organisation Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic
Contact organisation web site http://www.ochranaprirody.cz
Partner organisations Terén Design Ltd - www.terendesign.cz, Grania Ltd - www.grania.cz
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Centra part of the stream restoration

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


excavation of the new channel
excavation site
filling up the small "dams" in the deepened channel
winter higher flow
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district River Elbe
River basin River Elbe

Subcatchment

River name Müglitz
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 500 - 1000 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Site

Name National Reserve Black Meadow
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Over deepened, Straightened, Artificial bed
Reference morphology Actively meandering, Pool-riffle
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation International - RAMSAR site
Local/regional site designations National Reserve
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Menyanthes trifoliata, Pinguicula vulgaris
Dominant hydrology Groundwater
Dominant substrate Earth
River corridor land use Grassland, Wetland
Average bankfull channel width category Less than 2 m
Average bankfull channel width (m) 0.80.8 m <br />8.0e-4 km <br />80 cm <br />
Average bankfull channel depth category Less than 0.5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m) 0.30.3 m <br />3.0e-4 km <br />30 cm <br />
Mean discharge category Less than 0.1 m³/s
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 0.060.06 m³/s <br />60 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category 0.01 - 0.1
Average channel gradient 0.025
Average unit stream power (W/m2) 18.38812518.388 W/m² <br />


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 40004,000 m <br />4 km <br />400,000 cm <br />
Project started 2006/02/01
Works started 2009/08/01
Works completed 2010/11/30
Project completed 2010/11/30
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 264264 k€ <br />264,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources 90% covered by EU - Operational Programme Environment

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Land drainage
Hydromorphology Width & depth variation, Channel pattern/planform, Flow velocities
Biology Macrophytes, Invertebrates
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications construction of nearly completly new streambeds and directing water freely to the alluvial meadows
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of ponds by partially filling up the deepend and streightend channel
Planform / Channel pattern Allow future natural channel changes to occur
Other Recovering natural landscapes
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Management of vegetation, More natural water retention, monitoring
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other popularization of the project


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information