Case study:Off-Channels Restauration: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
worthwhile option in the interior, where winter conditions may be severe in the main channel | worthwhile option in the interior, where winter conditions may be severe in the main channel | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
Line 59: | Line 63: | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
Line 66: | Line 68: | ||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Revision as of 08:34, 6 September 2013
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality |
Country | France |
Main contact forename | François |
Main contact surname | Masset |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Federation de Peche Hautes Alpes |
Contact organisation web site | http://peche-hautes-alpes.com/ |
Partner organisations | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
Project summary
In the Guil and Durance Basin, side channels and off-channels features within the floodplain provide vital habitat to many juvenile and endemic brown trouts. Besides relatively sheltered rearing habitat, floodplain features provide important low velocity refugia during periods of high flow when fish remaining in the main channels are washed away.
these groundwater fed channels can be restored to provide valuable off-channel rearing habitat for trouts when these areas will no longer be created or naturally maintained as a consequence of hydro-modification, development, levee construction, incision or bank armoring that limit flooding and channel migration or dry the off-channels.
The key element of these sites is their perennial flow of generally cooler water in summer and warmer water in winter that increases fish survival and growth.
This restoration is particularly attractive for the high-energy Guil or Durance streams where flow extremes and channel instability often make it impractical to attempt rehabilitation of the main channel. Off-channel habitat rehabilitation can also be a
worthwhile option in the interior, where winter conditions may be severe in the main channel
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|