Case study:Inchewan Burn Bed restoration: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 165: Line 165:
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Image_gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Inchewan Burn.jpg
}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents}}

Revision as of 11:07, 9 August 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 56° 33' 23.45" N, 3° 34' 53.83" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://therrc.co.uk/rrc_case_studies1.php?csid=52
Themes Hydromorphology
Country Scotland
Main contact forename John
Main contact surname Monteith
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Tay
River basin Inchewan

Subcatchment

River name Inchewan Burn
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Urban, Woodland
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Birnam
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Single channel, Straight, Embanked, Revetments
Reference morphology Step-pool, Pool-riffle, Single channel
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off
Dominant substrate Bedrock
River corridor land use Urban, Woodland
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category Less than 0.5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 100 m0.1 km <br />10,000 cm <br />
Project started 2007/09/01
Works started
Works completed 2007/11/01
Project completed
Total cost category 50 - 100 k€
Total cost (k€) 100 k€100,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources SEPA, Perth Council, SNH

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Perth Council John Monteith
Stakeholder engagement and communication Perth Council John Monteith
Works and works supervision Perth Council
Post-project management and maintenance Perth Council
Monitoring Perth Council John Monteith



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, continuity of sediment transport, Flow velocities
Biology Restore free passage for fish and promote fish spawning (ie. salmonids).
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Native tree planting, placement of boulders - set in concrete.
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery


Inchewan Burn.jpg


Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information

RRC visit notes (2008):

The new bed has enabled free passage to the upper burn and has had a dramatic impact on the visual ‘eyesore’ previously viewed by users of the popular pathway. The construction of a step-pool bedrock and boulder bed has added stability to the channel and now allows a much freer movement of bed sediment.

The concept of needing to anchor the ‘key’ boulders into the engineered bed but burying this structural element under 500mm+ of placed material allowed concerns over structural stability, morphology and aesthetics to be integrated into a common solution.