Case study:Eddleston water: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=meandering channel, Introducing large woody debris, creation of a new floodplain parallel to the river; embankment renaturalization,
|Bank and bed modifications measure=meandering channel, Introducing large woody debris, creation of a new floodplain parallel to the river, embankment renaturalization,
|Floodplain / River corridor=Connection to wider floodplain,
|Floodplain / River corridor=Connection to wider floodplain,
}}
}}

Revision as of 11:10, 3 July 2013

4.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 55° 40' 53.00" N, 3° 12' 6.57" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Planned
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country Scotland
Main contact forename Nick
Main contact surname Elbourne
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Eddleston Water catchment restoration, photograph source:www.countryside-jobs.com

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Historical straightening and changes in land management which aimed to improve agricultural production has created a channel which is currently classified as “poor” by the WFD. The channel also causes occasional flooding in Eddleston and Peebles when rainfall is heavy. Restoration design aims to restore natural physical habitats both in the river corridor and the wide catchment, to achieve “good” WFD status. A secondary aim is to reduce the current level of flood risk.

Restoration strategy measures include: planting of riparian and floodplain forests, breaching embankments to create flood storage areas, re-meandering of the channel, introduction of large woody debris, creating local ponds and wetlands and setting fences back from the banks. Monitoring is in place to establish baseline conditions for rainfall and surface groundwater flows as well as water quality and ecology. Proposals and planning for "phase 2" of the project, which will involve implementation of some restoration plans are on-going. A demonstration trial reach is currently planned for Darnhall Farm, specifically to reduce flooding risk downstream.

A partnership of local and national organisations is coordinated by Tweed Forum, and includes the Scottish Government, Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Dundee University, Scottish Borders Council, National Farmers’ Union of Scotland, the British Geological Survey, the Forestry Commission, Scottish Natural Heritage, the Tweed Foundation and the Environment Agency of England.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Solway Tweed
River basin Solway Tweed

Subcatchment

River name Eddleston water
Area category
Area (km2) 6969 km² <br />6,900 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Grassland, Woodland
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Tweed Catchment Management Plan


Site

Edit site
Name Eddleston water
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Straightened, Embanked
Reference morphology Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations WFD status "poor"
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2009
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2013/05/01
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 50 - 100 k€ SEPA River Restoration Fund
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring

Supplementary funding information

Funded by the SEPA River Restoration Fund Scottish Government awarded funding over three financial years 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management
Hydromorphology Channel pattern/planform, Quantity & dynamics of flow
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications meandering channel, Introducing large woody debris, creation of a new floodplain parallel to the river, embankment renaturalization
Floodplain / River corridor Connection to wider floodplain
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents



Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description
http://www.tweedforum.org/projects/current-projects/eddleston leaflet.pdf The Eddleston Water project: Restoring natural habitat and reducing flood risk
http://www.tweedforum.org/projects/current-projects/Poster Katya Perez Chris Spray.pdf Assessment of stream course restoration and potential land use modification on flood risk reduction and other ecosystem services

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information