Case study:Inchewan Burn Bed restoration: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mattleeson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Mattleeson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Quantity & dynamics of flow, | |Hydromorphological quality elements=Quantity & dynamics of flow, continuity of sediment transport, flow velocities. | ||
|Biological quality elements=Restore free passage for fish and provide new habitat opportunities in the immediate reach. | |Biological quality elements=Restore free passage for fish and provide new habitat opportunities in the immediate reach. | ||
|Other motivation=Landscape enhancement | |Other motivation=Landscape enhancement |
Revision as of 15:50, 8 August 2012
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 56° 33' 23.45" N, 3° 34' 53.83" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://therrc.co.uk/rrc_case_studies1.php?csid=52 |
Themes | Hydromorphology |
Country | Scotland |
Main contact forename | John |
Main contact surname | Monteith |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Catchment and subcatchment
Select a catchment/subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | Tay |
---|---|
River basin | Inchewan |
Subcatchment
River name | Inchewan Burn |
---|---|
Area category | |
Area (km2) | |
Maximum altitude category | |
Maximum altitude (m) | |
Dominant geology | Siliceous |
Ecoregion | Great Britain |
Dominant land cover | Urban, Woodland |
Waterbody ID |
Site
Name | Birnam |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | Single channel, Straight, Embanked, Revetments |
Reference morphology | Step-pool, Pool-riffle, Single channel |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | true |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | |
Invasive species present | |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | Quick run-off |
Dominant substrate | Bedrock |
River corridor land use | Urban, Woodland |
Average bankfull channel width category | 2 - 5 m |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | Less than 0.5 m |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 100 m0.1 km <br />10,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 2007/09/01 |
Works started | |
Works completed | 2007/11/01 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | 50 - 100 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | 100 k€100,000 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | SEPA, Perth Council, SNH |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | Perth Council | John | Monteith | ||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | Perth Council | John | Monteith | ||
Works and works supervision | Perth Council | ||||
Post-project management and maintenance | Perth Council | ||||
Monitoring | Perth Council | John | Monteith |
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Native tree planting, placement of boulders, concrete base for boulders. Bed lined with Reno (gabion) mattresses to prevent downcutting - overlapped to form a run/drop longitudinal profile, for energy dissipation. |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|