Case study:HPP Blanca: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:
|Project picture=HPP Blanca and the fishway on the right part of the dam.png
|Project picture=HPP Blanca and the fishway on the right part of the dam.png
|Picture description=HPP Blanca and the fishway on the right part of the dam (http://www.he-ss.si/pdf/he_blanca-primer_dobre_prakse.pdf). .
|Picture description=HPP Blanca and the fishway on the right part of the dam (http://www.he-ss.si/pdf/he_blanca-primer_dobre_prakse.pdf). .
|Project summary=The fish pass on HPP Blanca is the first case of fish way on Sava river HPPs. It is located on the right part of HPP Blanca dam and constructed in the way of imitation of natural watercourse with hydrological characteristics, morphology, materials and varied habitat. The water level in the accumulation lake is changing for 1 m on the daily basis, which is why the inflow in fish pass has vertical slot pass with hydraulic barriers. Water velocity in the fish pass does not exceed 1 m/s. The flow is adjusted on fish migration and hydraulic scheme of the accumulation lake.
|Project summary=The fish pass on HPP Blanca is the first case of fish way on Sava river HPPs. It is located on the right part of HPP Blanca dam and constructed in the way of imitation of natural watercourse with hydrological characteristics, morphology, materials and varied habitat. The water level in the accumulation lake is changing for 1 m on the daily basis, which is why the inflow in fish pass has vertical slot pass with hydraulic barriers. Water velocity in the fish pass does not exceed 1 m/s. The flow is adjusted on fish migration and hydraulic scheme of the accumulation lake (http://www.he-ss.si/pdf/he_blanca-primer_dobre_prakse.pdf).


In order to bridge the differences in elevation, which is 9.4 m, the length of crossing is 680 m. Of these, 110 m of concrete section (intake facility on the upstream side) and 570 m of sustainable segment, in which also the culvert under a public road and drainage section is included (designed to attract fish). Water outflow from the fish pass itself attracts fish.
In order to bridge the differences in elevation, which is 9.4 m, the length of crossing is 680 m. Of these, 110 m of concrete section (intake facility on the upstream side) and 570 m of sustainable segment, in which also the culvert under a public road and drainage section is included (designed to attract fish). Water outflow from the fish pass itself attracts fish (http://www.he-ss.si/pdf/kratek-opis.pdf).


After the construction of HPP and fish way in 2009 the monitoring began and is still going on. The method used was electrical hunting and fish nets. In 2011 also telemetry was included in monitoring. Results showed that 32 of 40 fish in Sava river on the area of HPP Blanca was evidenced in the fish way (among them also Chrondrostoma nasus), since the beginning of the monitoring, which is good result.
After the construction of HPP and fish way in 2009 the monitoring began and is still going on. The method used was electrical hunting and fish nets. In 2011 also telemetry was included in monitoring. Results showed that 32 of 40 fish in Sava river on the area of HPP Blanca was evidenced in the fish way (among them also Chrondrostoma nasus), since the beginning of the monitoring, which is good result.


The base for this project, which was done by IBE d. d., was interest in fish species composition in lower Sava river, the assessment of population size for each species, biological characteristics and ecological needs of species. Recommended guidelines and literature about fish passes were basis for the project scheme. The fish experts from Fisheries Research Institute of Slovenia were included in the project from the beginning, which is very good progress in cooperation between experts and energy producers. Even more progress can be done with founding the permanent monitoring of fish way function and maintenance.
The base for this project, which was done by IBE d. d., was interest in fish species composition in lower Sava river, the assessment of population size for each species, biological characteristics and ecological needs of species. Recommended guidelines and literature about fish passes were basis for the project scheme. The fish experts from Fisheries Research Institute of Slovenia were included in the project from the beginning, which is very good progress in cooperation between experts and energy producers. Even more progress can be done with founding the permanent monitoring of fish way function and maintenance (http://www.he-ss.si/pdf/he_blanca-primer_dobre_prakse.pdf).
}}
}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case_study_subcatchment

Revision as of 09:22, 31 May 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 45° 59' 28.50" N, 15° 22' 52.50" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes
Country Slovenia
Main contact forename HESS d. o. o.
Main contact surname HESS d. o. o.
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation HESS d.o.o.
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
HPP Blanca and the fishway on the right part of the dam (http://www.he-ss.si/pdf/he_blanca-primer_dobre_prakse.pdf). .

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The fish pass on HPP Blanca is the first case of fish way on Sava river HPPs. It is located on the right part of HPP Blanca dam and constructed in the way of imitation of natural watercourse with hydrological characteristics, morphology, materials and varied habitat. The water level in the accumulation lake is changing for 1 m on the daily basis, which is why the inflow in fish pass has vertical slot pass with hydraulic barriers. Water velocity in the fish pass does not exceed 1 m/s. The flow is adjusted on fish migration and hydraulic scheme of the accumulation lake (http://www.he-ss.si/pdf/he_blanca-primer_dobre_prakse.pdf).

In order to bridge the differences in elevation, which is 9.4 m, the length of crossing is 680 m. Of these, 110 m of concrete section (intake facility on the upstream side) and 570 m of sustainable segment, in which also the culvert under a public road and drainage section is included (designed to attract fish). Water outflow from the fish pass itself attracts fish (http://www.he-ss.si/pdf/kratek-opis.pdf).

After the construction of HPP and fish way in 2009 the monitoring began and is still going on. The method used was electrical hunting and fish nets. In 2011 also telemetry was included in monitoring. Results showed that 32 of 40 fish in Sava river on the area of HPP Blanca was evidenced in the fish way (among them also Chrondrostoma nasus), since the beginning of the monitoring, which is good result.

The base for this project, which was done by IBE d. d., was interest in fish species composition in lower Sava river, the assessment of population size for each species, biological characteristics and ecological needs of species. Recommended guidelines and literature about fish passes were basis for the project scheme. The fish experts from Fisheries Research Institute of Slovenia were included in the project from the beginning, which is very good progress in cooperation between experts and energy producers. Even more progress can be done with founding the permanent monitoring of fish way function and maintenance (http://www.he-ss.si/pdf/he_blanca-primer_dobre_prakse.pdf).

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Danube River Basin District
River basin Danube

Subcatchment

River name Sava River
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 270270 m <br />0.27 km <br />27,000 cm <br />
Dominant geology
Ecoregion Dinaric Western Balkan
Dominant land cover Wetland
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: LIFE 06 NAT/SLO/000069 Intermittent Lake Cerknica


Site

Edit site
Name River Sava near settlement Blanca
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology SI1VT739_VT Sava Boštanj – Krško
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate Gravel, Cobble
River corridor land use Extensive agriculture, Woodland
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2009/01/01
Works started 2009/01/01
Works completed 2009/08/01
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Fisheries Research Institute of Slovenia
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring Fisheries Research Institute of Slovenia



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Hydropower
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish: Species composition, Fish: Abundance, Fish: Disturbance-sensitive species, Fish: Age structure
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications new river-bed near old channel
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern creation of fish pass
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions monitoring of fish in the fish pass
Social measures (incl. engagement) improved cooperation between energy producers and ecologists
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Flow velocities Yes

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Species composition Yes
Fish: Abundance Yes
Fish: Disturbance-sensitive species Yes
Fish: Age structure Yes

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery


Fish pass after construction (Foto: HESS d. o . o. archive).
Electrofishing (on the left) and sampling with fishing net (on the right) on Blanca HPP (photo: D. Zabric).


Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information

REFERENCES:

Zabric D. 2011. Prehodi za ribe pri HE Blanca – primer dobre prakse. Življenje vodi, str. 19–22. Availabe at: http://www.he-ss.si/pdf/he_blanca-primer_dobre_prakse.pdf

HESS d. o. o. Brežice. 2010. Prehod za vodne organizme na HE Blanca. Availabe at: http://www.he-ss.si/pdf/kratek-opis.pdf