Case study:Refilling the meanders of the Colostre: Difference between revisions
Anna.polazzo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Anna.polazzo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 255: | Line 255: | ||
{{Monitoring_documents}} | {{Monitoring_documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring_documents_end}} | {{Monitoring_documents_end}} | ||
{{ | {{Image gallery}} | ||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=1.Image2 .jpg | |||
|Caption=The Colostre canalised before restoration (1999). | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=3.Image1 0.jpg | |||
|Caption=One of the Colostre meanders (2009). | |||
}} | |||
{{Image_gallery_end}} | {{Image_gallery_end}} | ||
{{Additional_Documents}} | {{Additional_Documents}} |
Revision as of 20:46, 30 April 2013
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | |
Country | France |
Main contact forename | Vincent |
Main contact surname | Duru |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | FDPPMA Alpes-de-Haute-Provence |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Colostre, a tributary of the River Verdon, is a typically Mediterranean river, with very low water levels upstream of Riez and flash flooding due to storms. The Colostre constitutes one of the only breeding grounds for brown trout. The beaver has also been recorded in this area.
In the 1960s, following exceptional summer flooding, hydraulic improvements were made in order to modify the longitudinal profile of the river (resizing, straightening of the river and creation of weirs). These developments degraded the habitats of the river and caused significant erosion of the river banks.
In response to this situation, in 1996, state fishing institutes and the local fishing association, initiated a protection Plan with the aim of free movement of salmonids and rediversification of habitats. The restoration measures formed part of the implementation of this plan.
Thirteen meanders were restored. The disconnected meanders had not been filled in and instead had been left uncultivated; most of them thus remained identifiable. The first stage consisted of restoring access to the meanders by removing the poplars planted during the resizing of the river. Next, the current was diverted towards the old meanders which remained visible. The entrance to the straight channel was blocked using a submersible weir (consisted of timber billets covered with gravels, geotextile and protective mesh). The downstream part of the straight section was not closed off in order to allow for the dispersal of floodwaters. In areas in which the meanders were not identified, various experimental habitat diversification developments were carried out and weirs were removed or modified.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | Alpes-de-Haute-Provence |
---|---|
River basin | Rhône-Mediterranean |
Subcatchment
River name | Colostre |
---|---|
Area category | 100 - 1000 km² |
Area (km2) | 215 km²21,500 ha <br /> |
Maximum altitude category | |
Maximum altitude (m) | |
Dominant geology | |
Ecoregion | Alps |
Dominant land cover | |
Waterbody ID |
Site
Name | Regional Natural Park of Verdon |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | FRDR251 |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | Single channel, Straight |
Reference morphology | Sinuous |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | true |
National/international site designation | EU - Special Protected Area |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | |
Invasive species present | |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | Quick run-off, Artificially regulated |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | |
Average bankfull channel width category | 2 - 5 m |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | 44 m <br />0.004 km <br />400 cm <br /> |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | 0.670.67 m³/s <br />670 l/s <br /> |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | 1e-005 |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) | 0.0164267250.0164 W/m² <br /> |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 11000 m11 km <br />1,100,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 1996/01/01 |
Works started | 1999/01/01 |
Works completed | 2001/01/01 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | 50 - 100 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | 66 k€66,000 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | Water Agency, Regional Council, Dèpartment-level Council, Higher Fishing Council, Local fishing associations |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | 50 - 100 k€ | 66 k€66,000 € <br /> | Conseil Supérior de la Pêche-Departmental Brigade | ||
Post-project management and maintenance | Conseil Général (Départment Level Council) | ||||
Monitoring | Conseil Supérior de la Pêche-Departmental Brigade |
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Removal of weirs |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | Removal of poplars in old meanders, Re-meandering |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | Agreement with the owners, Public meetings in each commun affected by the project |
Other | River contract |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Fish: Species composition | Yes | Yes | Yes | Improvement | ||
Macrophytes & phytobenthos: Taxonomic composition | Yes | Improvement |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Presence of beavers | Yes | Improvement |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|