Case study:Logie Burn Restoration Project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background | {{Project background | ||
|Reach length directly affected=250 | |||
|Funding sources=Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Scottish Natural Heritage. | |Funding sources=Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Scottish Natural Heritage. | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 12:09, 7 March 2013
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring |
Country | Scotland |
Main contact forename | Estelle |
Main contact surname | Gill |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Scottish Natural Heritage |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.snh.gov.uk/ |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Logie Burn is graded as poor for its ecological status due to diffuse sediment and nutrient inputs in addition to morphological alteration. These issues account for agricultural and drainage demand over many decades. To begin with, the Logie Burn was canalized and dredged of original bed material. Two meanders were cut-off as part of the engineering works for straightening and deepening the burn. In particular, straightening of the Logie burn had adverse effects on in-stream diversity and lowered the burn’s ability to filter out silt being carried downstream.
This project targeted 160 m reach of the Logie Burn and included the re-connection of the two old meanders that were previously sealed off from the main channel. The primary purposes of the re-connection were to restore morphology, improve river habitat, enhance riparian habitat diversity and demonstrate this type of restoration to river managers. Enhancement of in-channel phosphorous storage also contributed to the reduction of the phosphorus transfer into the Loch Davan downstream of the Logie.
A monitoring programme commenced in July 2011 to assess how the geomorphology, habitat, phosphorous storage and the flood attenuation capacity of the reach change over time. Topographical and sedimentary surveys were undertaken before and after the re-connection and will be repeated annually. In addition, stream flow is being continuously monitored to allow assessment of the flood attenuation capacity and to help understand the geomorphic changes observed.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Name | |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | 23372 |
WFD (national) typology | Mid-altitude, Small, Calcareous |
WFD water body name | Logie Burn / Loch Davan |
Pre-project morphology | |
Reference morphology | |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | No |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | National Reserve |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | Artificially regulated |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | 1.61.6 m³/s <br />1,600 l/s <br /> |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 250250 m <br />0.25 km <br />25,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | |
Works started | |
Works completed | |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | |
Total cost (k€) | |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Scottish Natural Heritage. |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Mitigation of a pressure | |
---|---|
Hydromorphology | |
Biology | |
Physico-chemical | |
Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information