Case study:Vester Nebel Restoration: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(XML import)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case_study_status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=
|Approval status=Approved
   
 
 
   
      Draft
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location

Revision as of 16:18, 5 September 2013

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Land use management - agriculture
Country Denmark
Main contact forename Hans- Martin
Main contact surname Olsen
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Kolding Adal
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district
River basin Kolding

Subcatchment

River name Vester Nebel
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Central Plains
Dominant land cover Extensive agriculture
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Vester Nebel
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology Sinuous, Pool-riffle
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate Cobble, Bedrock, Boulders, Gravel
River corridor land use Extensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient 0.3
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 1025 m1.025 km <br />102,500 cm <br />
Project started 2007/11/01
Works started
Works completed 2008/07/01
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€) 550 k€550,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Danish Nature Agency

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Channel pattern/planform, Width & depth variation, Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish: Species composition, Fish: Abundance
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Community demand, Fisheries


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Regrading, Placement of spawning gravels
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Introducing sinuosity, Creation of new channel in places
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other Information provision, Consultation, Participation in design, Participation in monitoring


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Species composition Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Fish: Abundance Yes Yes Yes Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information