Case study:Černý potok stream restoration scheme: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 54: Line 54:
|Funding sources=90% covered by EU - Operational Programme Environment
|Funding sources=90% covered by EU - Operational Programme Environment
}}
}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Motivations
|Specific mitigation=Land drainage,
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Width & depth variation, Channel pattern/planform, Flow velocities,
|Biological quality elements=Macrophytes, Invertebrates,
|Other motivation=Landscape enhancement,
}}
{{Measures}}
{{Measures}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}

Revision as of 19:05, 28 January 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 44' 3.81" N, 13° 53' 29.49" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Spatial planning, Water quality
Country Czech Republic
Main contact forename Rous
Main contact surname Vít
Main contact user ID User:VRous
Contact organisation Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic
Contact organisation web site http://www.ochranaprirody.cz
Partner organisations Terén Design Ltd - www.terendesign.cz, Grania Ltd - www.grania.cz
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Centra part of the stream restoration

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district River Elbe
River basin River Elbe

Subcatchment

River name Müglitz
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 500 - 1000 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name National Reserve Black Meadow
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Over deepened, Straightened, Artificial bed
Reference morphology Actively meandering, Pool-riffle
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation International - RAMSAR site
Local/regional site designations National Reserve
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Menyanthes trifoliata, Pinguicula vulgaris
Dominant hydrology Groundwater
Dominant substrate Earth
River corridor land use Grassland, Wetland
Average bankfull channel width category Less than 2 m
Average bankfull channel width (m) 0.80.8 m <br />8.0e-4 km <br />80 cm <br />
Average bankfull channel depth category Less than 0.5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m) 0.30.3 m <br />3.0e-4 km <br />30 cm <br />
Mean discharge category Less than 0.1 m³/s
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 0.060.06 m³/s <br />60 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category 0.01 - 0.1
Average channel gradient 0.025
Average unit stream power (W/m2) 18.38812518.388 W/m² <br />


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 40004,000 m <br />4 km <br />400,000 cm <br />
Project started 2006/02/01
Works started 2009/08/01
Works completed 2010/11/30
Project completed 2010/11/30
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 264264 k€ <br />264,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources 90% covered by EU - Operational Programme Environment

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Land drainage
Hydromorphology Width & depth variation, Channel pattern/planform, Flow velocities
Biology Macrophytes, Invertebrates
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information