Case study:Restoration in Bognelva: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=The channelled river led to disapperance of fish | |Hydromorphological quality elements=The channelled river led to disapperance of fish | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Morphological diversification, Restoration of side channels, Reopening of side channels, Creation of pools, habitat improvements, | |||
|Social measures=Local public awareness, | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | {{Hydromorphological quality element table row |
Latest revision as of 09:47, 25 February 2020
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | |
Country | Norway |
Main contact forename | Knut Aune |
Main contact surname | Hoseth |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.nve.no |
Partner organisations | NMBU and NaturRestaurering |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Massive reconstruction of the lower 3,5 km of the Bogn river, including canalization and structural modifications to the main river and side channels the last 100 years had negative impact on landscape, biodiversity and productive populations of anadromous fish. The disappearance of fish led to local interests among fishermen, farmers and landowners to restore the river. Since numerous restoration measures were planned and implemented. The main aims was to restore the natural dynamics and diversity of the river system and its interactions with the surrounding valley. Since 2005, side channels and tributaries have been re-opened and re-established, habitat improvements such as pools and channels have been re-created, and scientific studies have been initiated for investigating the before and after situation for fish populations and biodiversity. Importantly, a strong and active local engagement has secured the success of this project.
Monitoring surveys and results
Habitat diversity, bird species, fish densities are included. Improved fish density and catchment.
Lessons learnt
Make a good story and go for it. Involvement and local engagement is the key to success.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|