Case study:Bio-engineering and creation of side channels along the rectified section of the Scarpe River in Arras

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00

(0 votes)

To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.

Location: 50° 17' 27.61" N, 2° 46' 39.13" E

Edit location

Loading map...

{"format":"googlemaps3","type":"HYBRID","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"limit":50,"offset":0,"link":"all","sort":[""],"order":[],"headers":"show","mainlabel":"","intro":"","outro":"","searchlabel":"... further results","default":"","import-annotation":false,"width":"auto","height":"400px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"visitedicon":"","wmsoverlay":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"cluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[""],"searchmarkers":"","fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"showtitle":false,"hidenamespace":true,"template":"Location map popup","userparam":"","activeicon":"","pagelabel":false,"ajaxcoordproperty":"","ajaxquery":"","locations":[{"text":"\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Title:\u003C/b\u003E Bio-engineering and creation of side channels along the rectified section of the Scarpe River in Arras\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003ECountry:\u003C/b\u003E \u003Ca href=\"/wiki/index.php?title=France\" title=\"France\"\u003EFrance\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Status:\u003C/b\u003E Complete\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EThemes:\u003C/b\u003E Water quality\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E","title":"Bio-engineering and creation of side channels along the rectified section of the Scarpe River in Arras","link":"","lat":50.291002,"lon":2.7775349999999,"icon":"/wiki/images/a/af/Red_marker.png"}]}

Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.

Project overview

Edit project overview

Status	Complete
Project web site
Themes	Habitat and biodiversity, Water quality
Country	France
Main contact forename	Nathalie
Main contact surname	Bret
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site	http://www.cu-arras.fr/
Partner organisations	Artois-Picardie water agency; Pas-de-Artois-Picardie water agency; Pas-de-Calais departmental federation of certified associations for fishing and protection of aquatic environments (FDAAPPMA 62)departmental federation of certified associations for fishing and protection of aquatic environments (FDAAPPMA 62)
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects	No

Creation of stagnant and semi-stagnant lagoons along the Scarpe. Summer 2010. (Communauté urbaine d’Arras)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.

In a partnership with the Artois-Picardie water agency, CUA launched ecological-restoration works on a section of the Scarpe. The reaches most affected by anthropogenic pressures were seen as the priority, namely the entire section between Arras and SaintLaurent-Blangy.

A study by a specialised consulting firm recommended restoring natural banks with a slight slope and improving the riparian vegetation.

The metal sheet piles, initially installed for bank protection, were deemed unsuitable and removed.

The banks were graded to a slight slope and stabilised using techniques suited to the hydraulic constraints weighing on each sector:

- helophyte rolls or calcareous landfill with geotextile fabric in areas where the constraints are not severe;

- mixed techniques (gabion bed and vegetated geomats) in areas subjected to greater constraints.

A total of 1 750 metres of bio-engineering bank-protection techniques were installed.

A number of measures were taken for the riparian vegetation, including planting of helophytes at the foot of banks, seeding of work areas with a mix of herbaceous plants, restoration of wooded areas by planting white willows and elimination of the invasive species found on site.

The top of the white willows was cut to encourage the growth of buds and of the tree trunks. This pruning technique will produce cavities that birds, small mammals and insects can use.

A lagoon was also created as an alluvial “annex” with two reed beds measuring 1 000 and 1 450 m² on the site of the former turn-around point for péniche barges in an effort to restore habitats for different species, notably pike.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.

An pre work survey was carried out in 2010,on the plant and animal compartments. Currently, no particular ecological monitoring has been set up. However, a check on the renewed growth of the vegetation was run in September 2012, during the works.

An assessment on the changes in the environment is also planned at some point at least five years after the works.

Unfortunately, the works had to be done from the water, which made it difficult. In addition, a large geese population, present on the river since before the works, has damaged and slowed the regrowth of the helophyte vegetation, particularly in the reed beds.

In 2010, the pre works assessment revealed a relictual population of woolly burdock that still existed on the site, but was threatened. The assessment was also an occasion to run surveys on two fish species, two emblematic bird species and one emblematic insect species. No amphibian species were noted.

An assessment of the impact of the works on the restored habitats and on biodiversity is planned at some point at least five years after the works in order to give enough time to the environment to adapt and to the various species to go through their life cycle. The assessment, carried out by a specialised consulting firm, will be based on the changes in the population numbers of the species listed in the initiallyt in order to determine the degree to which the objectives set by the project owner were met, namely:

- maintain the woolly burdock, pike and eel populations; - install at least one amphibian species; - double the number of bird and insect species (two and one respectively) observed prior to the works.

This project strove to achieve a balance between the ecological value of the site and its use as a waterway, i.e. a channel for commercial shipping, pleasure boating and the corresponding recreational activities. For example, the landscape of the site was improved with beneficial effects on tourism and pleasure boating, as well as on recreational activities (walking, etc.).

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Image gallery

Edit Image gallery

Catchment and subcatchment Select a catchment/subcatchment Site Edit site Name WFD water body codes WFD (national) typology WFD water body name Pre-project morphology Reference morphology Desired post project morphology Heavily modified water body National/international site designation Local/regional site designations Protected species present Invasive species present Species of interest Dominant hydrology Dominant substrate River corridor land use Average bankfull channel width category Average bankfull channel width (m) Average bankfull channel depth category Average bankfull channel depth (m) Mean discharge category Mean annual discharge (m3/s) Average channel gradient category Average channel gradient Average unit stream power (W/m2) Project background Edit project background Reach length directly affected (m) Project started Works started Works completed Project completed Total cost category Total cost (k€) Benefit to cost ratio Funding sources Cost for project phases Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname Investigation and design Stakeholder engagement and communication Works and works supervision Post-project management and maintenance Monitoring Reasons for river restoration Edit reasons for restoration Mitigation of a pressure Hydromorphology Biology Physico-chemical Other reasons for the project Measures Edit Measures Structural measures Bank/bed modifications Floodplain / River corridor Planform / Channel pattern Other Non-structural measures Management interventions Social measures (incl. engagement) Other Monitoring Hydromorphological quality elements Edit Hydromorphological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Biological quality elements Edit biological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Physico-chemical quality elements Edit Physico-chemical quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic Edit Other responses Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Monitoring documents Upload monitoring documents Additional documents and videos Upload additional documents Additional links and references Edit links and references Link Description Supplementary Information Edit Supplementary Information