Case study:Seseke Remodelling: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 15: Line 15:
|Contact organisation url=eglv.de
|Contact organisation url=eglv.de
|Multi-site=Yes
|Multi-site=Yes
|Project summary=Part of the integrated river basin management for the Seseke Region (315 km2) is the revitalization of the river Seseke and its tributaries. Due to industrialization the waterbodies were systematically developed as open wastewater sewers at the beginning of the 20th century. Economic and technical alternatives such as closed sewer systems could not be implemented due to constant subsidence caused by mining.
|Project summary=Part of the integrated river basin management for the Seseke Region (315 km<sup>2</sup>) is the revitalization of the river Seseke and its tributaries. Due to industrialization the waterbodies were systematically developed as open wastewater sewers at the beginning of the 20<sup>th</sup> century. Economic and technical alternatives such as closed sewer systems could not be implemented due to constant subsidence caused by mining.
The river system will be restructured, so that the Seseke will become a fully functioning, continous water-based ecosystem with typical topologies and vegetation.
The river system will be restructured, so that the Seseke will become a fully functioning, continous water-based ecosystem with typical topologies and vegetation.
Studies on the feasibility of restructuring the Seseke show, that due to coal mining, industrial and population changes the “original” conditions can never be reached again. It will not be possible to return the Seseke to its original, meandering state. So the reference conditions are no direct goals for the river restoration, but they give orientation in the planning procedure.
Studies on the feasibility of restructuring the Seseke show, that due to coal mining, industrial and population changes the “original” conditions can never be reached again. It will not be possible to return the Seseke to its original, meandering state. So the reference conditions are no direct goals for the river restoration, but they give orientation in the planning procedure.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}

Latest revision as of 13:38, 4 June 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 35' 12.60" N, 7° 42' 47.92" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country Germany
Main contact forename Mechthild
Main contact surname Semrau
Main contact user ID User:EGLV
Contact organisation Lippeverband
Contact organisation web site http://eglv.de
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Part of the integrated river basin management for the Seseke Region (315 km2) is the revitalization of the river Seseke and its tributaries. Due to industrialization the waterbodies were systematically developed as open wastewater sewers at the beginning of the 20th century. Economic and technical alternatives such as closed sewer systems could not be implemented due to constant subsidence caused by mining. The river system will be restructured, so that the Seseke will become a fully functioning, continous water-based ecosystem with typical topologies and vegetation. Studies on the feasibility of restructuring the Seseke show, that due to coal mining, industrial and population changes the “original” conditions can never be reached again. It will not be possible to return the Seseke to its original, meandering state. So the reference conditions are no direct goals for the river restoration, but they give orientation in the planning procedure.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information