Case study:Upper Emscher: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
|WFD (national) typology=Type 18: small loess-loam dominated lowland river | |WFD (national) typology=Type 18: small loess-loam dominated lowland river | ||
|WFD water body name=Emscher | |WFD water body name=Emscher | ||
|Heavily modified water body= | |Pre-project morphology=concrete lined bed and bank, Straightened, Over deepened, | ||
|Protected species present= | |Reference morphology=Actively meandering, groundwater dominated | ||
|Invasive species present= | |Desired post project morphology=Low gradient passively meandering, enabled contact between floodplain and water body | ||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=Yes | |||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |||
|Dominant hydrology=Groundwater, quick run-off | |||
|Dominant substrate=Clay, Silt, loam | |||
|River corridor land use=urban, Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Intensive agriculture (arable), | |||
|Average bankfull channel width category=2 - 5 m | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} |
Revision as of 13:07, 15 May 2014
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |
Country | Germany |
Main contact forename | Mechthild |
Main contact surname | Semrau |
Main contact user ID | User:EGLV |
Contact organisation | Emschergenossenschaft |
Contact organisation web site | http://eglv.de |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Part of the integrated river basin management for the Emscher Region (865 km2, 2.700 inhabitants/ km2) is the revitalization of the river Emscher and its tributaries. Due to industrialization the waterbodies were systematically developed as open wastewater sewers in the beginning of the 20th century. Economic and technical alternatives such as closed sewer systems could not be implemented due to constant subsidence caused by coal mining.
Momentarily, the river system is being restructured in order to enable the Emscher to once again be a fully functioning, continuous water-based ecosystem with typical topology and vegetation.
An ecological concept based on the assumption of a non-interrupted river as a connection from the source to the mouth has been developed.
Studies on the feasibility of restructuring the Emscher show, that due to coal mining, industrial impacts and population changes the “original” conditions can never be reached again. It will not be possible to return the Emscher to its original, meandering state. Therefore, the reference conditions are no direct goals for the river restoration, but they give orientation in the planning procedure.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Flood detention basin (HRB) Ickern-Mengede
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|