Case study:Flood channel creation and reconnection between riverbed and its floodplain on Vezouze river: Difference between revisions
Anna.polazzo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Flood risk management | |||
|Country=France | |Country=France | ||
|Main contact forename=Liliane | |Main contact forename=Liliane | ||
|Main contact surname=Biton | |Main contact surname=Biton | ||
|Contact organisation=Communauté de communes du Lunévillois | |Contact organisation=Communauté de communes du Lunévillois | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=The Vezouze River has a pluvial regimen and its flow is rapidly affected by the rainfall. This cause a recurring flood, often violent on the urban area of Lunéville. Several factors upstream (natural flooding areas reduction) and downstream (bad drainage conditions) make the situation worse. Thus bank protection and riprap were put in place and the riverbed was regularly cleaned up. After the great flood in 2006, the Lunèville community undertook a global protection program in order to reduce flood risk, including expansion areas restoration. | |||
The restoration works include increase in riverbed width, removal of a protection bank on the left side, creation of two flood channels (one meter wide on average, on six hectares) with connected wetlands and revegetation of the riverbanks and the new channels. | |||
The results are really satisfactory, regarding both the ecological and hydraulic aspects; the water level and flooded areas were clearly reduced on Lunéville. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=1.crue .jpg | |||
|Caption=The Vezouze at Luneville before the restoration. The protection bank on the left side prevents the flood expansion in the floodplain. | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=2.DSC00309compress.JPG | |||
|Caption=The Vezouze floodplain during the works in July 2007: creation of a flood channel on the left bank. | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=3.IMG 6758.JPG | |||
|Caption=The Vezouze floodplain six months after works in December 2007; the flood channel on the left bank | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=4.100 7922.JPG | |||
|Caption=The Vezouze floodplain two years after works in May 2009; the flood channel on the left bank | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=La Vezouze | |Subcatchment=La Vezouze | ||
Line 29: | Line 52: | ||
|Works completed=2007/08/01 | |Works completed=2007/08/01 | ||
|Total1 cost=1930 | |Total1 cost=1930 | ||
|Funding sources=Direction régionale de l’environnement (DIREN) (20,5 %), | |Funding sources=Direction régionale de l’environnement (DIREN) (20,5 %), Agence de l’eau (34 %). | ||
|Invst and design cost=50 | |Invst and design cost=50 | ||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=agence de l’eau, DIREN | |Investigation and design Lead organisation=agence de l’eau, DIREN | ||
Line 38: | Line 61: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Riverbank revegetation, Removal of bank reinforcements, | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Floodplain reconnection, Creation of a flood expansion area, | |Floodplain / River corridor=Floodplain reconnection, Creation of a flood expansion area, | ||
|Other technical measure= Surface drainage systems improved, | |Planform / Channel pattern=Channel widening, | ||
|Other technical measure=Surface drainage systems improved, | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
Line 68: | Line 92: | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Case study documents | |||
|File name=25 3 rex r5 vezouze vbat.pdf | |||
|Description=Case study description by ONEMA (French National Agency for Water and Aquatic Environments) (in French) | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
{{Additional links and references header}} | {{Additional links and references header}} | ||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 15:10, 2 January 2019
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management |
Country | France |
Main contact forename | Liliane |
Main contact surname | Biton |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Communauté de communes du Lunévillois |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Vezouze River has a pluvial regimen and its flow is rapidly affected by the rainfall. This cause a recurring flood, often violent on the urban area of Lunéville. Several factors upstream (natural flooding areas reduction) and downstream (bad drainage conditions) make the situation worse. Thus bank protection and riprap were put in place and the riverbed was regularly cleaned up. After the great flood in 2006, the Lunèville community undertook a global protection program in order to reduce flood risk, including expansion areas restoration.
The restoration works include increase in riverbed width, removal of a protection bank on the left side, creation of two flood channels (one meter wide on average, on six hectares) with connected wetlands and revegetation of the riverbanks and the new channels.
The results are really satisfactory, regarding both the ecological and hydraulic aspects; the water level and flooded areas were clearly reduced on Lunéville.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|