Case study:Skårhultsdammen bypass channel at River Knipån: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower | |Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower | ||
|Country=Sweden | |Country=Sweden | ||
|Main contact forename= | |Main contact forename=Ingemar | ||
|Main contact surname= | |Main contact surname=Bergbom | ||
|Main contact id=Arolam | |||
|Contact organisation=Länsstyrelsen i Jönköpings län | |Contact organisation=Länsstyrelsen i Jönköpings län | ||
|Contact organisation url=projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/vattern/Sv/besoksmal-vatterbackar/knipan/Pages/Skarhultsdammen.aspx | |Contact organisation url=projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/vattern/Sv/besoksmal-vatterbackar/knipan/Pages/Skarhultsdammen.aspx | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Restoration of river Knipån | |Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Restoration of river Knipån | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Constructed new strem (photo. Maria Arola).JPG | |||
|Picture description=Constructed new strem channel (photo. Maria Arola) | |||
|Project summary=Skårhultsdammen pond was built in 1920th century and was used as water regulation for Kvarnekulla power plant. Local farmers were using water from Skårhultsdammen for irrigation which made water level downstreams unnatural low. There were also other negative effects of the pond for the river. One of the biggest problems for the ecology of the Knipån was the outlet of the pond which made the migration difficult for fish like trout and greyling. Also coarse fish which thrivdes in the pond had negative effects for migrating fish. | |Project summary=Skårhultsdammen pond was built in 1920th century and was used as water regulation for Kvarnekulla power plant. Local farmers were using water from Skårhultsdammen for irrigation which made water level downstreams unnatural low. There were also other negative effects of the pond for the river. One of the biggest problems for the ecology of the Knipån was the outlet of the pond which made the migration difficult for fish like trout and greyling. Also coarse fish which thrivdes in the pond had negative effects for migrating fish. | ||
In 2009 and 2010 started the project as the aim of improving ecological and hydromorphological conditions of the River Knipån. The longest bypass channel in Sweden was constructed for making fish migration possible and making hydromorpological condtitions of the water closer to natural state. All and all 55 000 m2 sediment was taken away which increased the water volyme from 25 000 m2 to 80 000 m2. Total cost of the restoration was about 230 000 euros. | In 2009 and 2010 started the project as the aim of improving ecological and hydromorphological conditions of the River Knipån. The longest bypass channel in Sweden was constructed for making fish migration possible and making hydromorpological condtitions of the water closer to natural state. All and all 55 000 m2 sediment was taken away which increased the water volyme from 25 000 m2 to 80 000 m2. Total cost of the restoration was about 230 000 euros. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Sinuous (photo. Maria Arola).JPG | |||
|Caption=Meandering of the new stream (photo. Maria Arola) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Creation of variation of the stream by adding stones and gravel (photo. Maria Arola).JPG | |||
|Caption=Constructed new stream (stones and gravel added) (photo. Maria Arola) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Confluence of old stream and new strem (photo. Maria Arola).JPG | |||
|Caption=Confluence of old stream and new strem (photo. Maria Arola) | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=River Knipån | |Subcatchment=River Knipån | ||
Line 43: | Line 63: | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
Line 50: | Line 68: | ||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 16:53, 6 September 2013
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/vattern/Sv/besoksmal-vatterbackar/knipan/Pages/Skarhultsdammen.aspx |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower |
Country | Sweden |
Main contact forename | Ingemar |
Main contact surname | Bergbom |
Main contact user ID | User:Arolam |
Contact organisation | Länsstyrelsen i Jönköpings län |
Contact organisation web site | http://projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/vattern/Sv/besoksmal-vatterbackar/knipan/Pages/Skarhultsdammen.aspx |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Skårhultsdammen pond was built in 1920th century and was used as water regulation for Kvarnekulla power plant. Local farmers were using water from Skårhultsdammen for irrigation which made water level downstreams unnatural low. There were also other negative effects of the pond for the river. One of the biggest problems for the ecology of the Knipån was the outlet of the pond which made the migration difficult for fish like trout and greyling. Also coarse fish which thrivdes in the pond had negative effects for migrating fish.
In 2009 and 2010 started the project as the aim of improving ecological and hydromorphological conditions of the River Knipån. The longest bypass channel in Sweden was constructed for making fish migration possible and making hydromorpological condtitions of the water closer to natural state. All and all 55 000 m2 sediment was taken away which increased the water volyme from 25 000 m2 to 80 000 m2. Total cost of the restoration was about 230 000 euros.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Kvarnekulla nature like bypass channel at River Knipån
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|