Case study:The Fortuna Restoration Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case_study_status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 10: Line 10:
|Main contact forename=Marian
|Main contact forename=Marian
|Main contact surname=Tudor
|Main contact surname=Tudor
|Contact organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority
|Contact organisation=The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea
|Contact organisation url=www.ddni.ro
|Partner organisations=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=Lacul Fortuna romania.infoturism.ro.jpg
|Project picture=Lacul Fortuna romania.infoturism.ro.jpg
|Picture description=Fortuna lake (photo: www.infoturism.ro)
|Picture description=Fortuna lake (source: www.infoturism.ro)
|Project summary=The aim of the project was to connecting agricultural polder Fortuna (2,115 ha) to the Danube regime. Restoration of hydrological regime and hydrological functions means for this area, restoring and establishing the following functions:
- habitat for plants and animals typical alluvial areas;
- habitat and breeding area for fish and aquatic birds;
- reservoir for biodiversity and providing genetic resources;
- biocoridor and genetic exchange;
- organic production;
- biogeochemical circuit elements;
- retention of sediments and pollutions;
- Black Sea biofilter
 
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Fortuna-lake panoramio com.jpg
|Caption=Fortuna lake location (source: www.panoramio.com)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Fisherman on Lake Fortuna - Danube Delta.jpg
|Caption=Fisherman on Lake Fortuna (source: www.panoramio.com)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Intrare pe lac vanatorul.ro.jpg
|Caption=Intrance on the Rortuna Lake (source: www.vanatorul.ro)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Restoration works.jpg
|Caption=Restoration works in the Danube Delta (source: Orhan Ibram, www.slideshare.net)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Fortuna project.jpg
|Caption=Fortuna project (source: Orhan Ibram, www.slideshare.net
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Lebede pe lac vanatorul.ro.jpg
|Caption=Awans on th Fortuna Lake (source: www.vanatorul.ro)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Lacul Fortuna, iulie 2011 Praporgicu Traian.jpg
|Caption=Fortuna Lake, July 2011 (source:Praporgicu Traian)
}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case_study_subcatchment
|Subcatchment=
|Subcatchment=
Line 42: Line 87:
|Avrg channel gradient=0.015
|Avrg channel gradient=0.015
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=
|Project started=1999/12/01
   
|Works started=2004/03/01
   
|Works completed=2004/11/01
     
|Total cost category=more than 10000 k€
|Project started=
|Total1 cost=2093000 k€
      1999/12/01
|Funding sources=GEF – BM Programe
|Works started=
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
      2004/03/01
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=Marian
|Works completed=
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=Tudor
      2004/11/01
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
|Project completed=
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
|Total cost category=
|Monitoring Lead organisation=The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro)
      more than 10000 k€
|Monitoring Other contact forename=Marian
|Total1 cost=
|Monitoring Other contact surname=Tudor
      2093000 k€
|Funding sources=
      GEF – BM Programe
|Investigation and design cost category=
     
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
      The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
      Marian
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
      Tudor
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
     
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
      The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
     
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
     
|Wrk and supervision cost=
     
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
      The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
     
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
     
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
      The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
     
|Monitoring1 cost category=
     
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
      The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro)
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
      Marian
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
      Tudor
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
Line 129: Line 119:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Create breaches in the bank
   
|Planform / Channel pattern=Reconnecting polder,
   
      Create breaches in the bank
|Floodplain / River corridor=
     
|Planform / Channel pattern=
      Connecting Fishpond Fortuna to the Danube regime
|Other technical measure=
     
|Management interventions=
     
|Social measures=
     
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
     
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_element_table_row
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Quantity & dynamics of flow
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=Yes
   
|Qualitative monitoring=No
      Quantity & dynamics of flow
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Monitored before=
|Control site used=No
     
|Result=Improvement
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
      Improvement
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_element_table_row
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Continuity of sediment transport
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=No
      Continuity of sediment transport
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Monitored before=
|Quantitative monitoring=No
     
|Control site used=No
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
     
}}
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Biological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Biological quality elements header}}
{{Biological_quality_element_table_row
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Fish
   
|Monitored before=Yes
   
|Monitored after=No
   
|Qualitative monitoring=No
   
|Quantitative monitoring=No
      Fish
|Control site used=No
|Monitored before=
|Result=Improvement
     
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
      Improvement
}}
}}
{{Biological_quality_element_table_row
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Invertebrates
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=Yes
      Invertebrates
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Monitored before=
|Quantitative monitoring=No
     
|Control site used=No
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
     
}}
}}
{{Biological_quality_element_table_row
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Macrophytes
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=No
      Macrophytes
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Monitored before=
|Quantitative monitoring=No
     
|Control site used=No
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
     
}}
}}
{{Biological_quality_element_table_row
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Phytoplankton
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=No
      Phytoplankton
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Monitored before=
|Quantitative monitoring=No
     
|Control site used=No
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
     
}}
{{Biological_quality_element_table_row
|Element=
   
   
      Zooplancton
|Monitored before=
     
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
     
}}
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_elements_header}}
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_element_table_row
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Nutrient concentrations
   
|Monitored before=Yes
   
|Monitored after=No
   
|Qualitative monitoring=No
   
|Quantitative monitoring=No
      Nutrient concentrations
|Control site used=No
|Monitored before=
|Result=Improvement
     
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
      Improvement
}}
}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_element_table_row
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Salinity
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=Yes
      Salinity
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Monitored before=
|Quantitative monitoring=No
     
|Control site used=No
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
     
}}
}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_element_table_row
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Oxygen balance
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=No
      pH
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Monitored before=
|Quantitative monitoring=No
     
|Control site used=No
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
     
}}
}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_element_table_row
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Temperature
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=No
      Oxygen balance
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Monitored before=
|Quantitative monitoring=No
     
|Control site used=No
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
     
}}
}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_element_table_row
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=PH
   
|Monitored before=No
   
|Monitored after=No
      Temperature
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Monitored before=
|Quantitative monitoring=No
     
|Control site used=No
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
     
}}
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Other_responses_header}}
{{Other responses header}}
{{Other_response_table_row
{{Other response table row
|Element=
|Element=Fish
   
|Monitored before=Yes
   
|Monitored after=No
   
|Qualitative monitoring=No
   
|Quantitative monitoring=No
      medicinal plants
|Control site used=No
|Monitored before=
|Result=Improvement
     
}}
|Monitored after=
{{Other response table row
     
|Element=Pastures
|Qualitative monitoring=
|Monitored before=No
     
|Monitored after=No
|Quantitative monitoring=
|Qualitative monitoring=No
     
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=
|Control site used=No
     
}}
|Result=
{{Other response table row
      Improvement
|Element=Reed
|Monitored before=No
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=No
}}
{{Other response table row
|Element=Medicinal plants
|Monitored before=No
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=No
}}
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Image_gallery}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_header}}
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references
|Link=www.ddni.ro
|Description=The website of the Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development (DDNIRD)
}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}}
{{Supplementary_Information
{{Supplementary_Information
|Information=
|Information=
      
      
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
}}
}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Latest revision as of 09:46, 2 June 2017

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 45° 11' 28.43" N, 29° 8' 53.17" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes
Country Romania
Main contact forename Marian
Main contact surname Tudor
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea
Contact organisation web site http://www.ddni.ro
Partner organisations The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Fortuna lake (source: www.infoturism.ro)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The aim of the project was to connecting agricultural polder Fortuna (2,115 ha) to the Danube regime. Restoration of hydrological regime and hydrological functions means for this area, restoring and establishing the following functions: - habitat for plants and animals typical alluvial areas; - habitat and breeding area for fish and aquatic birds; - reservoir for biodiversity and providing genetic resources; - biocoridor and genetic exchange; - organic production; - biogeochemical circuit elements; - retention of sediments and pollutions; - Black Sea biofilter

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Fortuna lake location (source: www.panoramio.com)
Fisherman on Lake Fortuna (source: www.panoramio.com)
Intrance on the Rortuna Lake (source: www.vanatorul.ro)
Restoration works in the Danube Delta (source: Orhan Ibram, www.slideshare.net)
Fortuna project (source: Orhan Ibram, www.slideshare.net
Awans on th Fortuna Lake (source: www.vanatorul.ro)
Fortuna Lake, July 2011 (source:Praporgicu Traian)
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin

Subcatchment

River name Sulina Branch
Area category Less than 10 km²
Area (km2) 2.115 km²211.5 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 1.50 m0.0015 km <br />150 cm <br />
Dominant geology Organic (i.e. Peat), clay
Ecoregion Pontic Province
Dominant land cover Grassland, Reed
Waterbody ID



Site

Name Forestry polder Fortuna
WFD water body codes RORW14.1_B5
WFD (national) typology RO15
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Embanked, Forestry area
Reference morphology Sinuous, Artificial channel
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation International - RAMSAR site
Local/regional site designations Biosphere Reserves
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated, Floodplain area
Dominant substrate Clay, Peat
River corridor land use Grassland, Wetland
Average bankfull channel width category 10 - 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m) 15.0015 m <br />0.015 km <br />1,500 cm <br />
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m) 1.5 m0.0015 km <br />150 cm <br />
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 69.769.7 m³/s <br />69,700 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient 0.015
Average unit stream power (W/m2) 683.5479683.548 W/m² <br />


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 1999/12/01
Works started 2004/03/01
Works completed 2004/11/01
Project completed
Total cost category more than 10000 k€
Total cost (k€) 2093000 k€2,093,000,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources GEF – BM Programe

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea Marian Tudor
Stakeholder engagement and communication The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
Works and works supervision The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
Post-project management and maintenance The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
Monitoring The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro) Marian Tudor



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Continuity for organisms, Width & depth variation
Biology Fish, Macrophytes, Phytoplankton
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Create breaches in the bank
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Reconnecting polder
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Quantity & dynamics of flow No Yes No No No Improvement
Continuity of sediment transport No No No No No

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes No No No No Improvement
Invertebrates No Yes No No No
Macrophytes No No No No No
Phytoplankton No No No No No


Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Nutrient concentrations Yes No No No No Improvement
Salinity No Yes No No No
Oxygen balance No No No No No
Temperature No No No No No
PH No No No No No

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes No No No No Improvement
Pastures No No No No No
Reed No No No No No
Medicinal plants No No No No No


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.ddni.ro The website of the Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development (DDNIRD)

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information